<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bluestem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/bluestem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/bluestem/</link>
	<description>How can we live without the unknown before us? —Rene Char</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 01:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/bluestem/#comment-71694</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/09/bluestem/#comment-71694</guid>
		<description>Do you have anyone in particular in mind?

Oh hell, it&#039;s like shooting fish in a barrel, isn&#039;t it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have anyone in particular in mind?</p>
<p>Oh hell, it&#8217;s like shooting fish in a barrel, isn&#8217;t it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Harmon</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/bluestem/#comment-71391</link>
		<dc:creator>David Harmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 04:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/09/bluestem/#comment-71391</guid>
		<description>It might have been G. Harry Stine who commented &quot;we &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; as gods -- we might as well get good at it&quot;.  Unfortunately, there are too many folks who can&#039;t give up their delusions of omnicompetence....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might have been G. Harry Stine who commented &#8220;we <i>are</i> as gods &#8212; we might as well get good at it&#8221;.  Unfortunately, there are too many folks who can&#8217;t give up their delusions of omnicompetence&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/bluestem/#comment-71367</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 03:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/09/bluestem/#comment-71367</guid>
		<description>Bill - Great comment! Guess I&#039;ll have to look up squamous and inguinal now. Let&#039;s see...

&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biology.lsu.edu/heydrjay/ThomasSay/terms.html#S&quot;&gt;Squamous&lt;/a&gt;, scaly; covered with scales.&quot;

&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nsrl.ttu.edu/tmot1/glossary.htm&quot;&gt;inguinal&lt;/a&gt; â€” Pertaining to or in the region of the groin.&quot;

twitches - Glad you liked it. Thanks for stopping by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill &#8211; Great comment! Guess I&#8217;ll have to look up squamous and inguinal now. Let&#8217;s see&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;<a href="http://www.biology.lsu.edu/heydrjay/ThomasSay/terms.html#S">Squamous</a>, scaly; covered with scales.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;<a href="http://www.nsrl.ttu.edu/tmot1/glossary.htm">inguinal</a> â€” Pertaining to or in the region of the groin.&#8221;</p>
<p>twitches &#8211; Glad you liked it. Thanks for stopping by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twitches</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/bluestem/#comment-71352</link>
		<dc:creator>twitches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 02:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/09/bluestem/#comment-71352</guid>
		<description>An amazing post, with wonderful pictures. Perfect for a cold winter&#039;s Saturday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An amazing post, with wonderful pictures. Perfect for a cold winter&#8217;s Saturday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/bluestem/#comment-71349</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 02:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/09/bluestem/#comment-71349</guid>
		<description>I have once described myself as sessile.  Love that word, which is a sort of past participle of sedentary.  My only knack for Latin was a love of the vocabulary.  Glabrous, squamous, inguinal, so many descriptors of things bodily, yet out of bounds when one wishes to be understood.    Dick Jones recently posted a poem, which I think you Smorgasblogged, featuring both &quot;spatulate&quot; and &quot;buboes&quot;.  My heart saltated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have once described myself as sessile.  Love that word, which is a sort of past participle of sedentary.  My only knack for Latin was a love of the vocabulary.  Glabrous, squamous, inguinal, so many descriptors of things bodily, yet out of bounds when one wishes to be understood.    Dick Jones recently posted a poem, which I think you Smorgasblogged, featuring both &#8220;spatulate&#8221; and &#8220;buboes&#8221;.  My heart saltated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/bluestem/#comment-71347</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 02:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/09/bluestem/#comment-71347</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the rant, Bev - my feelings exactly. The attitude of many (most?) professional land managers is particularly galling to me, because these are the people who should know better. Or at least admit how little they - and we - do know about so many fundamental processes. But unfortunately they aren&#039;t being paid to do nothing, so they continually dream up new &quot;projects&quot; and &quot;treatments.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the rant, Bev &#8211; my feelings exactly. The attitude of many (most?) professional land managers is particularly galling to me, because these are the people who should know better. Or at least admit how little they &#8211; and we &#8211; do know about so many fundamental processes. But unfortunately they aren&#8217;t being paid to do nothing, so they continually dream up new &#8220;projects&#8221; and &#8220;treatments.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bev</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/bluestem/#comment-71270</link>
		<dc:creator>bev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 23:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/09/bluestem/#comment-71270</guid>
		<description>By the way, I got so carried away with that little rant that I forgot to say that this was a very nice piece.  (-:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, I got so carried away with that little rant that I forgot to say that this was a very nice piece.  (-:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bev</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/bluestem/#comment-71269</link>
		<dc:creator>bev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 23:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/09/bluestem/#comment-71269</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Our descendents will learn to love this shining, depauperate world.&lt;/i&gt;

Yes, that&#039;s just what I&#039;m afraid of.  In fact, I think we&#039;re about 90 percent of the way to that state of mind.  Having attended the occasional  forest or parkland planning meeting over the years, it&#039;s quite clear that most people don&#039;t see the value of old fields, scrub, or wetlands.  Most do seem to &quot;get&quot; forests, but think that a planting a narrow strip of pine trees covers all the bases.   Likewise, the same gang seem to be under the mass delusion that a storm water reservoir is the same thing as a pond.  Well, I guess so, if you like your ponds full of lawn fertilizer, and other run-off from lawns, streets and parking lots.   Few understand anything about forest interiors or the importance of wildlife corridors and contiguous habitat.   I&#039;m at the point that, if I hear, &quot;It&#039;s only an old swamp!&quot; one more time -- spoken as justification for  turning a wetland area into a housing development -- I&#039;ll probably scream.  Just sign me -- Ol&#039; Curmugeon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Our descendents will learn to love this shining, depauperate world.</i></p>
<p>Yes, that&#8217;s just what I&#8217;m afraid of.  In fact, I think we&#8217;re about 90 percent of the way to that state of mind.  Having attended the occasional  forest or parkland planning meeting over the years, it&#8217;s quite clear that most people don&#8217;t see the value of old fields, scrub, or wetlands.  Most do seem to &#8220;get&#8221; forests, but think that a planting a narrow strip of pine trees covers all the bases.   Likewise, the same gang seem to be under the mass delusion that a storm water reservoir is the same thing as a pond.  Well, I guess so, if you like your ponds full of lawn fertilizer, and other run-off from lawns, streets and parking lots.   Few understand anything about forest interiors or the importance of wildlife corridors and contiguous habitat.   I&#8217;m at the point that, if I hear, &#8220;It&#8217;s only an old swamp!&#8221; one more time &#8212; spoken as justification for  turning a wetland area into a housing development &#8212; I&#8217;ll probably scream.  Just sign me &#8212; Ol&#8217; Curmugeon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/bluestem/#comment-71169</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/09/bluestem/#comment-71169</guid>
		<description>Rachel - Thanks. Esperanto-speaking, interstellar Quakers, though - yikes!

marly - I&#039;m glad the wandering style wasn&#039;t a turn-off.

I hadn&#039;t thought about whether the common name &quot;broomsedge&quot; indicates that the plant has been used for making brooms, but I don&#039;t see why it couldn&#039;t be.

I actually sort of enjoy sweeping, though I don&#039;t usually remember to do so until the dirt is pretty obvious.

Peter - Well, of course you only get blue shadows with strong sunlight, and sometimes the sun doesn&#039;t put in too many appearances during the winter, depending on where on lives. So such associations aren&#039;t going to be nearly as common as whiteness and purity (&quot;pure as the driven snow&quot;).

&quot;Depauperate&quot; means almost exactly the same as &quot;impoverished.&quot; It&#039;s ecological jargon, really. I thought about using &quot;impoverished&quot; there, but I just don&#039;t like the sound of the word as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rachel &#8211; Thanks. Esperanto-speaking, interstellar Quakers, though &#8211; yikes!</p>
<p>marly &#8211; I&#8217;m glad the wandering style wasn&#8217;t a turn-off.</p>
<p>I hadn&#8217;t thought about whether the common name &#8220;broomsedge&#8221; indicates that the plant has been used for making brooms, but I don&#8217;t see why it couldn&#8217;t be.</p>
<p>I actually sort of enjoy sweeping, though I don&#8217;t usually remember to do so until the dirt is pretty obvious.</p>
<p>Peter &#8211; Well, of course you only get blue shadows with strong sunlight, and sometimes the sun doesn&#8217;t put in too many appearances during the winter, depending on where on lives. So such associations aren&#8217;t going to be nearly as common as whiteness and purity (&#8220;pure as the driven snow&#8221;).</p>
<p>&#8220;Depauperate&#8221; means almost exactly the same as &#8220;impoverished.&#8221; It&#8217;s ecological jargon, really. I thought about using &#8220;impoverished&#8221; there, but I just don&#8217;t like the sound of the word as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/bluestem/#comment-70997</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 16:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/02/09/bluestem/#comment-70997</guid>
		<description>Snow can be so blue.  It makes wonder why blue and snow aren&#039;t associated much (you know, &quot;snow blue,&quot; for instance).

Thanks for enriching my vocabulary with &quot;depauperate.&quot;

Very sobering post.  I don&#039;t know much about the subject, but it seems like a great summary of what we face as a planet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snow can be so blue.  It makes wonder why blue and snow aren&#8217;t associated much (you know, &#8220;snow blue,&#8221; for instance).</p>
<p>Thanks for enriching my vocabulary with &#8220;depauperate.&#8221;</p>
<p>Very sobering post.  I don&#8217;t know much about the subject, but it seems like a great summary of what we face as a planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
