<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: American conquistadors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vianegativa.us/2009/01/american-conquistadors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2009/01/american-conquistadors/</link>
	<description>How can we live without the unknown before us? —Rene Char</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:48:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dale</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2009/01/american-conquistadors/#comment-9782</link>
		<dc:creator>dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/?p=3638#comment-9782</guid>
		<description>(If there are any such, I don&#039;t see what harm it would do.  From my tradition&#039;s perspective, anyway, we practice empathy not mainly because it does other people good but mainly because it does us good.)

Thanks for the good words, Dave!  It&#039;s no coincidence, of course, that I think of these men much as you think of your conquistadors:  I&#039;ve been absorbing your take on them for some time :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(If there are any such, I don&#8217;t see what harm it would do.  From my tradition&#8217;s perspective, anyway, we practice empathy not mainly because it does other people good but mainly because it does us good.)</p>
<p>Thanks for the good words, Dave!  It&#8217;s no coincidence, of course, that I think of these men much as you think of your conquistadors:  I&#8217;ve been absorbing your take on them for some time :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2009/01/american-conquistadors/#comment-9781</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/?p=3638#comment-9781</guid>
		<description>Nathan - Great comment. I suspect that there are many third ways; you&#039;ve hit on one of them (an important one). There&#039;s a moral paradox, too: to what extent does it make sense to feel empathy toward those who may be incapable of experiencing empathy themselves?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan &#8211; Great comment. I suspect that there are many third ways; you&#8217;ve hit on one of them (an important one). There&#8217;s a moral paradox, too: to what extent does it make sense to feel empathy toward those who may be incapable of experiencing empathy themselves?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2009/01/american-conquistadors/#comment-9780</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/?p=3638#comment-9780</guid>
		<description>You hit on a great point -- that these men are too easily dismissed or adulated, that there might be a third way. But what is this third way, is it this fascination with the unbearable acts committed by men like Sherman, Jackson and Cortes? 
My favorite contemporary philosopher, Slavoj Zizek, a Slovenian, was criticized by his audience during a lecture on Hitchcock&#039;s films. The audience wondered how he could give this lecture when atrocities were being committed in his country. His reply: &quot;How can you talk about Hitchcock?&quot; We need to be fascinated by these atrocities precisely so we can see our own lives as &#039;normal.&#039; It seems to me that rather than try to understand the man who pulls trigger, we try to understand the &#039;normal&#039; lives of those who had the guns pointed at them with the full understanding that we live under the guns as well. That we &quot;admit that in a sense we also imitate peace, live in a fiction of peace. [that] Sarajevo is not an island, an exception within the sea of normality; on the contrary, this alleged normality is in itself an island of fictions within the common warfare.&quot; The common war is not over. It happens everyday in Iraq, on the East Side of Columbus, Ohio, on television, in your brain every time you say &quot;well, I&#039;m an exception.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You hit on a great point &#8212; that these men are too easily dismissed or adulated, that there might be a third way. But what is this third way, is it this fascination with the unbearable acts committed by men like Sherman, Jackson and Cortes?<br />
My favorite contemporary philosopher, Slavoj Zizek, a Slovenian, was criticized by his audience during a lecture on Hitchcock&#8217;s films. The audience wondered how he could give this lecture when atrocities were being committed in his country. His reply: &#8220;How can you talk about Hitchcock?&#8221; We need to be fascinated by these atrocities precisely so we can see our own lives as &#8216;normal.&#8217; It seems to me that rather than try to understand the man who pulls trigger, we try to understand the &#8216;normal&#8217; lives of those who had the guns pointed at them with the full understanding that we live under the guns as well. That we &#8220;admit that in a sense we also imitate peace, live in a fiction of peace. [that] Sarajevo is not an island, an exception within the sea of normality; on the contrary, this alleged normality is in itself an island of fictions within the common warfare.&#8221; The common war is not over. It happens everyday in Iraq, on the East Side of Columbus, Ohio, on television, in your brain every time you say &#8220;well, I&#8217;m an exception.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

