<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Processing words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vianegativa.us/2009/04/processing-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2009/04/processing-words/</link>
	<description>How can we live without the unknown before us? —Rene Char</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:48:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: poetics and technology &#171; Read Write Poem</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2009/04/processing-words/#comment-10424</link>
		<dc:creator>poetics and technology &#171; Read Write Poem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/?p=4177#comment-10424</guid>
		<description>[...] the first, &#8220;Processing Words,&#8221; Dave traces his writing evolution. Guest writer Peter takes Twitter into his English class [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the first, &#8220;Processing Words,&#8221; Dave traces his writing evolution. Guest writer Peter takes Twitter into his English class [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2009/04/processing-words/#comment-10423</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 23:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/?p=4177#comment-10423</guid>
		<description>Whoa. That&#039;s a lot. On the other hand, I haven&#039;t tried counting mine. There might be as many as 10,000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa. That&#8217;s a lot. On the other hand, I haven&#8217;t tried counting mine. There might be as many as 10,000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2009/04/processing-words/#comment-10422</link>
		<dc:creator>Joan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/?p=4177#comment-10422</guid>
		<description>well, i&#039;ve printed next to none and i have well over 15,000 of them on my computer.  nutty!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, i&#8217;ve printed next to none and i have well over 15,000 of them on my computer.  nutty!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2009/04/processing-words/#comment-10421</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/?p=4177#comment-10421</guid>
		<description>Glad you liked. Me, I have never printed &lt;em&gt;any&lt;/em&gt; of my photos. Isn&#039;t that weird?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you liked. Me, I have never printed <em>any</em> of my photos. Isn&#8217;t that weird?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2009/04/processing-words/#comment-10420</link>
		<dc:creator>Joan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/?p=4177#comment-10420</guid>
		<description>good to hear that someone else stuck with WordPerfect for as long as i did - yay mom!

i don&#039;t write poetry but i do take photographs, digital photographs, that i keep on my computer with a back-up to an external drive.  but i rarely print out my photos any more.  thinking about some of the points you write about here though has me wondering whether it is not time to start doing so again.  thanks for the provocative read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good to hear that someone else stuck with WordPerfect for as long as i did &#8211; yay mom!</p>
<p>i don&#8217;t write poetry but i do take photographs, digital photographs, that i keep on my computer with a back-up to an external drive.  but i rarely print out my photos any more.  thinking about some of the points you write about here though has me wondering whether it is not time to start doing so again.  thanks for the provocative read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fetish of the outmoded &#171; (p) (b)</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2009/04/processing-words/#comment-10419</link>
		<dc:creator>fetish of the outmoded &#171; (p) (b)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/?p=4177#comment-10419</guid>
		<description>[...] leave a comment &#187;  responding, tangentially, to Dave [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] leave a comment &raquo;  responding, tangentially, to Dave [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2009/04/processing-words/#comment-10418</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 15:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/?p=4177#comment-10418</guid>
		<description>Hey Dale, thanks for putting in a pitch for free software! Almost everything I use was free to me in the sense that it was a gift or hand-me-down (shh!), but I&#039;m still a Microsoft vassal -- it&#039;s great to hear from a former Unix user. I sometimes forget, given your extreme conservatism about making any changes to your blog, that you were actually a professional geek in a former life. The advice about not letting the tools push you around strikes me as very sound, and if I had any sense I&#039;d take it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dale, thanks for putting in a pitch for free software! Almost everything I use was free to me in the sense that it was a gift or hand-me-down (shh!), but I&#8217;m still a Microsoft vassal &#8212; it&#8217;s great to hear from a former Unix user. I sometimes forget, given your extreme conservatism about making any changes to your blog, that you were actually a professional geek in a former life. The advice about not letting the tools push you around strikes me as very sound, and if I had any sense I&#8217;d take it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2009/04/processing-words/#comment-10417</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 15:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/?p=4177#comment-10417</guid>
		<description>Thanks for making a valuable distinction that I neglected to mention. I should&#039;ve perhaps broadened the focus to digital text editing as a whole, and stressed that word processing is only one form of that. If I revise this essay for publication elsewhere, I&#039;ll certainly add at least a paragraph on this, since over-reliance on word processing is actually a bit of a pitfall for bloggers or contributors to listservs, etc., who don&#039;t understand the MS Word docs are a mare&#039;s nest of weird formatting tags that need to be stripped out via a plain text editor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for making a valuable distinction that I neglected to mention. I should&#8217;ve perhaps broadened the focus to digital text editing as a whole, and stressed that word processing is only one form of that. If I revise this essay for publication elsewhere, I&#8217;ll certainly add at least a paragraph on this, since over-reliance on word processing is actually a bit of a pitfall for bloggers or contributors to listservs, etc., who don&#8217;t understand the MS Word docs are a mare&#8217;s nest of weird formatting tags that need to be stripped out via a plain text editor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dale</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2009/04/processing-words/#comment-10416</link>
		<dc:creator>dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 15:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/?p=4177#comment-10416</guid>
		<description>I use Wordpad for drafts, because it&#039;s free and quick.  If I have to create a document that Word can read, I use Abiword, which is also free, and so far as I can tell does everything Word does, without the monopoly price tag.

One of my favorite things about word processing is that it lets poems divide (or more rarely, merge) painlessly.  I often find that a poem I&#039;m working on is actually more than one poem.  Save the doc under a new name, swoosh through and delete the other poem&#039;s lines -- and hey presto!  Two poems where there was one.  I love that.

I learned word processing on the Unix world&#039;s &quot;vi&quot; editor, which was a bit quicker -- far less mouse-based -- than the Windows-based editors.  I suppose I might still go off to Linux land, eventually, except that I&#039;m probably too lazy.

A great breakthrough for me was Numenius&#039;s recommendation of Scribus -- yet again, excellent freeware -- for desktop publishing, i.e. things such as designing brochures or business cards.  Before that I tried to do such work on word processors, which can kinda sorta do it, but only at the cost of much hair-tearing. 

The right tool for the right job.  There are tons of wonderful, free software tools out there.  If there&#039;s anything I&#039;ve learned, working in software for many years, it&#039;s -- don&#039;t let your tools push you around.  Take the time to find the right ones and learn how they work:  you recoup the time thus spent almost at once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Wordpad for drafts, because it&#8217;s free and quick.  If I have to create a document that Word can read, I use Abiword, which is also free, and so far as I can tell does everything Word does, without the monopoly price tag.</p>
<p>One of my favorite things about word processing is that it lets poems divide (or more rarely, merge) painlessly.  I often find that a poem I&#8217;m working on is actually more than one poem.  Save the doc under a new name, swoosh through and delete the other poem&#8217;s lines &#8212; and hey presto!  Two poems where there was one.  I love that.</p>
<p>I learned word processing on the Unix world&#8217;s &#8220;vi&#8221; editor, which was a bit quicker &#8212; far less mouse-based &#8212; than the Windows-based editors.  I suppose I might still go off to Linux land, eventually, except that I&#8217;m probably too lazy.</p>
<p>A great breakthrough for me was Numenius&#8217;s recommendation of Scribus &#8212; yet again, excellent freeware &#8212; for desktop publishing, i.e. things such as designing brochures or business cards.  Before that I tried to do such work on word processors, which can kinda sorta do it, but only at the cost of much hair-tearing. </p>
<p>The right tool for the right job.  There are tons of wonderful, free software tools out there.  If there&#8217;s anything I&#8217;ve learned, working in software for many years, it&#8217;s &#8212; don&#8217;t let your tools push you around.  Take the time to find the right ones and learn how they work:  you recoup the time thus spent almost at once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saqeram</title>
		<link>http://www.vianegativa.us/2009/04/processing-words/#comment-10415</link>
		<dc:creator>Saqeram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 14:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/?p=4177#comment-10415</guid>
		<description>I prefer to use plain text editors.  Modern word processors are far too distracting. I&#039;d use them only for laying text out into an acceptable layout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer to use plain text editors.  Modern word processors are far too distracting. I&#8217;d use them only for laying text out into an acceptable layout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

