Comments on: Flock https://www.vianegativa.us/2007/10/flock/ Purveyors of fine poetry since 2003. Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:45:54 +0000 hourly 1 By: Dave https://www.vianegativa.us/2007/10/flock/#comment-6256 Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:45:54 +0000 http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/10/25/flock/#comment-6256 Glad you liked. Scarily, perhaps, I had already forgotten about the post; when your comment showed up, I couldn’t for the life of me remember when I had written a post entitled “Flock.” That’s flocked up.

]]> By: rr https://www.vianegativa.us/2007/10/flock/#comment-6255 Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:56:47 +0000 http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/10/25/flock/#comment-6255 My navel is heaving convulsively as a result of those last two comments. Another wonderful post, thank you.

]]> By: Dave https://www.vianegativa.us/2007/10/flock/#comment-6254 Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:02:00 +0000 http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/10/25/flock/#comment-6254 Thanks, Peter.

Hi, Theriomorph. Thanks for resisting that. I know what a struggle it must have been.

]]> By: Theriomorph https://www.vianegativa.us/2007/10/flock/#comment-6253 Sun, 28 Oct 2007 13:40:35 +0000 http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/10/25/flock/#comment-6253 I am sitting here this morning reading your post, enjoying your prose and thought-trains as always, overwhelmed by a desire to say ‘flocked if I know,’ and trying hard not to.

]]> By: Peter https://www.vianegativa.us/2007/10/flock/#comment-6252 Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:18:21 +0000 http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/10/25/flock/#comment-6252 A delightful recapitulation of a via negativa, and of Via Negativa.

Every breeze precipitated a small shower and a clatter of acorns. — a lovely line.

]]> By: Dave https://www.vianegativa.us/2007/10/flock/#comment-6251 Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:19:42 +0000 http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/10/25/flock/#comment-6251 Yep. Thanks, good catch.

]]> By: Jean https://www.vianegativa.us/2007/10/flock/#comment-6250 Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:58:44 +0000 http://www.vianegativa.us/2007/10/25/flock/#comment-6250 I think it’s enough, a lot.

By the way, in para 4, line 7: did you mean ‘uses them in alternation’?

]]>