<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="https://publishpress.com/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: New commenting system	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.vianegativa.us/2012/10/new-commenting-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.vianegativa.us/2012/10/new-commenting-system/</link>
	<description>Purveyors of fine poetry since 2003.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:14:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave Bonta		</title>
		<link>https://www.vianegativa.us/2012/10/new-commenting-system/#comment-37493</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Bonta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/?p=20290#comment-37493</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.vianegativa.us/2012/10/new-commenting-system/#comment-37478&quot;&gt;Marja-Leena Rathje&lt;/a&gt;.

No doubt true, though it continues to amaze me how few have learned to adopt plausible names and get gravatars. And since Google&#039;s most recent major change to its algorithm last winter, the kind of backlinks spam commenters provide if they do get their comments posted should only penalize the sites they link to, so I&#039;m cautiously optimistic that the whole business will fade over the next few years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.vianegativa.us/2012/10/new-commenting-system/#comment-37478">Marja-Leena Rathje</a>.</p>
<p>No doubt true, though it continues to amaze me how few have learned to adopt plausible names and get gravatars. And since Google&#8217;s most recent major change to its algorithm last winter, the kind of backlinks spam commenters provide if they do get their comments posted should only penalize the sites they link to, so I&#8217;m cautiously optimistic that the whole business will fade over the next few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rr		</title>
		<link>https://www.vianegativa.us/2012/10/new-commenting-system/#comment-37481</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 01:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/?p=20290#comment-37481</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Another test!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another test!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marja-Leena Rathje		</title>
		<link>https://www.vianegativa.us/2012/10/new-commenting-system/#comment-37478</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marja-Leena Rathje]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vianegativa.us/?p=20290#comment-37478</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ok, testing if this comes through! I&#039;m told that the professional spammers are always working the systems, finding ways to break through, so it seems that after a while we have to keep a step ahead. Grr.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, testing if this comes through! I&#8217;m told that the professional spammers are always working the systems, finding ways to break through, so it seems that after a while we have to keep a step ahead. Grr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
