A personal selection of posts from around the Anglophone blogosphere, including Substack, with a commitment to following a somewhat haphazardly chosen selection of poets, poetry lovers, literary critics and publishers over time. Although I tend to quote my favorite bits, please do click through and read the whole posts. You can also browse the blog digest archive at Via Negativa or, if you’d like it in your inbox, subscribe on Substack (where the posts might be truncated by some email providers).
This week: wildly latticing light, hot jets of horse breath, a ropey ladder down to oblivion, and much more. Enjoy.
There are days when I can’t stand this any more, when I’m not strong or brave enough, when the horror and depravity leave the voices screaming ‘What can I possibly do?’ and the colours in my head are red and orange and black and there are others I can’t identify, that I have never seen before and I don’t know who I’ve ever been or who anyone else is…
And I watch the old film of Bruce Springsteen singing ‘for each unharmful gentle soul misplaced inside a jail’ before thousands of East Berliners in 1988 and I think ‘what have I ever done that’s as useful and honourable as that?’ and the voices know the answer and the bodies behind the voices stamp and mock, just as they should.
Bob Mee, THERE ARE DAYS WHEN I CAN’T STAND THIS ANY MORE
o, for an exit that isn’t an ending, dear god. the garden, its slough of orange flowers. the sky, its routine blue. the wildly latticing light. heavy-scented stock, those florid avatars of orgasm. the gorgeous daisy’s gauchely perforated eye.
Fran Lock, AFTER AMY
Many years ago, I drafted a poem that I worked on awhile and considered finished. I sent it out a few places, and then realized it wasn’t ready after all. I shelved it for a long while, then revised it, and I like it better now; but I don’t think I will submit it again. It feels like too personal a poem to me, and here’s why: when I felt more satisfied with it, I showed it to my mother (it’s about her). She was quiet for a fairly long time. Then she looked at me and asked, “How did you know this?”
Well, I’d imagined it. Guessed. But I felt floored that maybe I’d found words to say what she couldn’t say, and that she felt I had it right–her experience, I mean, her feelings. And now that feels important to me, because my mother died just a few days ago.
But this blog is sort of personal, after all, and so I am posting it here as a not-quite-finished, imperfect poem that nonetheless said enough to the person I wrote it about. My audience of one, in this case. Which is enough for me, and rare enough in the art of creative writing; and I really cannot come up with words this week given how I feel about my mom’s death. “Still processing,” as they say. Each of us does that differently, and each grief differs depending upon relationship and circumstances.
My mother’s passing was extremely peaceful, calm, accepting, about as uncomplicated as a death can be. Yet I will be holding onto the experience and my feelings about it for a long time to come.
Ann E. Michael, Departures
The monsoon sky has no answer. It comes back year after year to hear our songs. It brings the sowing season and I select poems to place deep in the ground. What does a poem grow into? What serration will its leaves bear? What poison will colour its fruits? What should a poem-farmer do? And for what? The clouds descend – charcoal grey. Like warnings.
I open a fresh Word document. Book_Four.docx. At the cusp of futility and insanity, there is almost always another new, unnecessary poem.
Rajani Radhakrishnan, Writing – But for What?
And this has been a week of light, book-ended with community writing workshops in small Northern towns. From May, I’ve offered free “On the moors” writing workshops, an offer which remains open to any Lancashire or Yorkshire organisation or group of individuals with a venue. It’s part of my ongoing work to increasing understanding of, and connection with, our Northern moors and other peatlands. It’s also part of my personal strategy for surviving the social and political divisions affecting the landscapes I love best. By turning away from that zero-sum game of who belongs and who doesn’t, and focussing instead on place and nature as something we can share a connection with and a responsibility for, by focussing on creative writing and teaching as my activist response, I give myself a bit of agency, a bit of comfort.
Last Friday I took the workshop to Trawden, close to my own homegrounds of Pendle and Walshaw Moor; today I headed to Horwich. In both small towns, creative writing gave expression – from the first minutes – to a love of the moors so deep it brought people to tears. It gave space to the desire not just to laid claim to, or to enjoy, but to protect and care for: place and neighbourhood, each other.
Whether it’s paid or not, I love this work. After the Trawden workshop, I drove home over the moors brimming with happiness. I stopped at Wycoller and to revel in its gateposts and walls, (one of my current niche obsessions) and in the evening, I met Kim, to swim in a high reservoir on Todmorden moor in the evening sun.
Clare Shaw, A sense of belonging
A coastal walk to blow the cobwebs off is always on my list of self-care things to do, and this week’s trip to the seaside did the trick. I like walking in my local town, and I like walking in the forest nearby, but there is a particular joy to walking at the coast that delights me. The fresh air, the sound of the waves and the ever-changing view as the tide comes in or goes out offer the kind of refreshment that reaches mind, body and soul.
My brain felt as though it was crammed full of ideas this week as I set about writing some new anniversary poems. I have always loved my anniversary tea towel which shows me the traditional symbol for each wedding anniversary, and I have enjoyed choosing specific presents over the years for my wife that match these. However it was when I was asked to write a poem for a husband to give to his wife on their Jade anniversary that I became determined to do more anniversary poetry writing. I was flattered to be asked and to be recognised as a poet who could turn their hand to such things and crafted the words carefully. This then got me thinking about using poems as small gifts or for cards for people I knew. They were well received, and I felt myself at the beginnings of a slowly evolving project. I recently had the opportunity to bring the jade poem to a different couple, and then when I was working on a different poem last week I had the idea that it would be super cool to have written a poem for all of the anniversaries. A great idea, but when I slowed down a little I realised this doesn’t exactly tie in with the way I write. I need time and I had to shake off my feeling that I wanted them all done in the next couple of days like a set of Pokémon ready to be collected. And of course there is more to it than preparing the poems. On my website each digital download sits behind a ‘label’ and it was making these labels that sent me into a whirl of believing I sort of knew how to do it, asking Kath to remind me how to do it, doing it successfully and then needing to change a background colour and promptly forgetting how I had done it! All that kept me amused for quite some time and perhaps that puts into context why a walk beside the sea was the perfect treat this week.
Sue Finch, POEMS TO MATCH A TEATOWEL
Even when so much is awful, wonders in our own lives still have a way of blooming like wildflowers, and it’s ever more essential to share them. When I hear about your bumper crop of blueberries, benign biopsy, reconnection with an old friend, new puppy, or whatever enlivens your life it enlarges my joy too.
So here’s my good news. My fourth poetry collection, Universe Marveled Into A Jar, just came out. I can’t believe how lucky I am!
Here’s the book description:
These pages hold praise songs to wonderments diverse as moss, mistakes, memory, even an imaginary donkey. Laura’s poems are wild and tender explorations into many realms of our universe’s marvels.
It is dedicated to women I love with acknowledgements not only to journals and anthologies that published my work but also to my beloved poetry writing group, the 811s, who were instrumental in shaping these poems.
I am fortunate to have this book published by Sheila-Na-Gig, a nonprofit arts organization/poetry journal/small press founded and run by the indefatigable visionary Hayley Mitchell Haugen (who is also an amazing poet). Each step of the process from raw manuscript to finished book has been a testament to Hayley’s patient expertise. She even allowed me to skip the usual back cover blurbs. Instead it features kind words fellow writers have already posted about my poems—with vast gratitude to Kim Langley, C.A. Gunn, Elizabeth H.S. Beasley, and Iesha Jackson.
Laura Grace Weldon, My New Book Is Here!
I’ve written previously about my sense that haiku and longer poems come from different parts of the brain; how haiku, the best ones, distil the collision of two sensory experiences in one moment to produce a spark, a connection or contrast, which the reader has to intuit, whereas longer poems, with their wider canvas, can move backwards and forwards through time in a manner rarely possible in haiku. The Last One Picked benefits from having a lifetime, and a whole career’s worth (as a GP), of experience and thought to draw upon.
Handysides writes ruminatively about his upbringing, and its strict morality, in a very religious household, impacting on even the joy of collecting, as in ‘History of the Motor Car in Fifty Picture Cards’ where ‘you felt ashamed for asking’ the ‘elderly or uncommitted friends’ if you might have ‘the cards we saw on mantelpieces’, only to be told ‘in no uncertain terms: / those are for my grandson, nephew[,] / someone who means more to me than you. That ‘uncommitted’ is satisfyingly ambiguous as to its meaning.
There’s an encounter with a horse in ‘A Solitary Mare’ which is reminiscent of Larkin’s ‘At Grass’ in how it sympathetically regards the animal’s age, but it feels much more real than Larkin’s deskbound speculation. It ends thus:
At night she nears my caravan.
I hear her snort, tear off the grass
I feel her presence, weight of hooves nearby
and next day when I sit to wire a plug
she comes to see
her long head reaches over me
hot jets of horse breath on my hands
she rubs her mighty forehead on my back
her fellow feeling floors me.The absence of punctuation other than the two full-stops is irksome at first, but adds to the fluidity of the action, as does the alliteration at the end.
Matthew Paul, On Stuart Handysides’s The Last One Picked
I want to describe Terri Cohlene’s long overdue debut poetry collection, A Conspiracy of Blackbirds, as a hodge-podge, but only if you understand hodge-podge as that strange little store crammed with ancient washing machines, pitchforks, maybe a statue of Cupid or a wrought iron hen with her clutch of chicks, maybe a bag full of unexpected gems. In this collection of poems, you never know what you’ll find, and you’re sure to find exactly what you need.
Cohlene’s subjects include old photographs, old work boots, mothers, daughters, MS, bronzed baby shoes from decades back, lost checkbooks…I could go on. As Patrick Dixon describes it: A Conspiracy of Blackbirds is “a book of surprises.” Somehow—how does she do it?—it all comes together, even the hard stuff transforming into occasions for delight. In “Finally, I Become What You Always Wanted,” addressed to the poet’s mother, we find these instructions: “Cut me open, / count the rings.” One expects such a poem to end with scars, instead—apple blossoms.
Remind me to make a copy of “On the Table” for my massage therapist. It’s a list of all the places old hurts have secreted themselves (an ex-husband, a third-grade teacher, a bully…), and ends:
Then there’s my estranged
mother, lodged like a lizard
around my sternum—
a reminder of why bones
are needed to protect the heart.On the back cover, poet Sandra Yannone offers the perfect precis: “A Conspiracy of Blackbirds chronicles how one woman breaks free from a multi-generational cycle of abandonments to reach for the sky in a transformative murmuration of stunning flight.” Exactly so. Cohlene—an artist, children’s book writer, playwright, and more—offers a map to the healing and sustaining power of art.
Bethany Reid, Terri Cohlene’s A CONSPIRACY OF BLACKBIRDS
The Last Season, David Lloyd, Tiger Bark Press, 2025, ISBN 978-1-7329012-8-5, $18.95
(For the sake of clarity, this is the Welsh-American David Lloyd, not the Irish one.)
What, I found myself asking when I picked this book up, is the last season? And have no answer, but several answers: a single person’s decline towards death; the impact of climate change on those parts of the world that until recently had a clearly demarcated seasonal cycle that is now blurring around the edges; and, more prosaically perhaps, winter, which also tends to signify death. In the poem that gives this collection its title, David Lloyd seems to be touching on all three readings:
I’ve forgotten, the names I refuse, the names
I speak as I peel back bandages. Heal
me. Forgive me. Forgive my seasons
of discontent. Forgive my frigid hands
grasping what they desire. Forgive the time
devoted to myself. Forgive the frostits bite. Let me raise these now old hands
into the healing air, up out of time,
into this last season, this deepest frost.‘The Last Season’ is the last of six sestinas that make up the second (of six) section of the book, and Lloyd uses the cyclical, planispiral nature of the form to lay out themes of decay and death, both personal and planetary, that run through the book. His use of enjambment across line and stanza drives the language forward, a dynamic that cuts against the possibility of fatalism in the poems.
Billy Mills, The Last Season by David Lloyd: A Review
Although the poems explore a daughter/father relationship, one explains why there are no parent/children relationships, “Barren” is inspired by Sylvia Plath’s metaphors,
“O moon-swallowed sun.
O urge that’s flick-knife sharp.
I’m five crows nailed to a barnyard door,
a plundered nest, a hen house after the fox has called.This womb that streaks its shepherd’s warning.
This one plus one that always comes to nought.”It’s fun trying to link metaphor with poem, but the underlying point is a serious one. Plath herself was dismissive of women who couldn’t be mothers, perhaps as a means of providing herself with some self-reassurance during her separation from Hughes. It is agonising as a woman who wants children but finds herself unable to have any and humour is used to deflect attention away.
Booker has a confidence with crafting poems, using recognisable situations, that makes her work very readable. She’s not afraid to use humour against herself to make a point. Her subjects allow for complexity, allowing that scenarios are not straightforward. In real life, it’s rarely as simple as dividing people into good and bad. The multiverse concept allows for consideration of multiple possibilities, opening these poems beyond the personal.
Emma Lee, “Pedestrian in the Multiverse” Claire Booker (Waterloo Press) – book review
I once wrote an essay about my many floppy disks of saved AOL Instant Messenger (AIM) conversations. I credit the hundreds of hours I spent agonizing over the tone of my “away messages” (a performance of “away,” since most of the time, we were parked right there watching people enter and leave the chat) with my development as a writer.
That’s where my sense of what it means to have a voice on the page originated, between the hours of 8:00 and 10:00 p.m. with friends and acquaintances. Those AIM conversations existed slightly outside of time—often you’d return to school or camp the next day only to find the intimacies exchanged didn’t translate to a new reality beyond that consuming correspondence.
So, the epistolary form has fascinated me. Reading letters feels—indeed is—a form of eavesdropping (a sensibility at the heart of lyric poetry). A letter offers a remarkably intimate sense of who these individuals were, which naturally includes how they expressed doubt and hesitation.
In the case of Sally McDowell [the ex-wife of the former governor of Baltimore] and John Miller [a pastor], their letters begin in 1854 with her refusal of his offer of marriage. Imagine starting a correspondence there! We know that, by the end of the tome (the collected letters amount to 944 pages over two years), they will end up together. But, as is true of poetry, it’s not what a poem means but how it means that leaves an impact. Their candor and their wit, their mundane recounting and surprises—I found the voice they built together, their how, gripping and affecting, as well as historically complicated (right on the advent of the Civil War).
Miller said something I’ll never forget in those early letters after McDowell’s refusal: that when two ships collide at sea, they should remain in touch, until the extent of the damage is determined. That was at the back of my mind the whole time I wrote the collection. That people should remain close until the extent of the damage is determined. I interpret “damage” loosely—I am most interested in how people are transformed by coming into each other’s lives, and in how chance meetings shape our paths. That seems to me to be one of the chief promises of being alive.
Maya C. Popa, Letters as Eavesdropping
Almost two years ago exactly I was listening to T. Swift’s Tortured Poets Department on repeat and it occurred to me, one line from “So High School” would be a great title for what was then just an amorphous and incomplete manuscript which included a couple of series that centered around the idea of women as property, a chattel, but also as monsters in their own way. The pretty dead things series was at the heart of it, my poems about 17th century vampire brides, but also the governess poems of terrible and unguessable, which had been finished the year before. I was also in the thick of wedding planning for the next summer, which had me thinking of brides and bargains and contracts just generally. Because I was busy getting ready to release RUINPORN, I scribbled the title down in a notebook and put it away. As the poem series intended for that particular full-length project grew over the past two years, first through the winged poems, another sea-washed series called deepwater, and this winter with the abattoir letters, the book began to take shape and I grew even more resolute on the title choice. [link added]
Kristy Bowen, some notes on the new book
Cliques are funny but are we in an age without any? and better for that? What would a study of the rather uncliquey yet catholic [Peter] Finch tell us and with what kind of root? A tree’s? A proliferating soil grabbing weed’s? We need good historical overview, a robust dialectic, and a taste for reading lots of poets of the past and recent past and present, to answer.
For example, an Edward Lucie-Smith review of Jeff Nuttall’s 1969 book Bomb Culture suggests why 60s and 70s cliques snubbed each other. Lucie-Smith says that their schisms can be seen to resolve around emulating pop culture comedians and bands. There would be disapproval from one sect if another did. He also said Brits squander surrealism – because they get the giggles. [Andrew] Taylor quotes Finch mentioning Nuttall (“Nuttall said walk hell walk they want you to read poems give them fiction stream of consciousness can’t tell the beginning from the end like Warhol’s Empire State”) but he stays away from key questions like Nuttall’s libertarian interest in harassment of women and girls. Can we discuss schisms that revealed both sides tragically part right and tragically part wrong? To do so, one must fire shots at all sides.
Lucie-Smith’s review never says he’s named (with a testy sigh) in Bomb Culture. But at least he made Nuttall’s index. This is in a sense the respectful practice of the poetry battlefield, and Lucie-Smith could take it as sword brandishing at a rival. One Ira Lightman gets a Taylor mention sometimes by implication, but isn’t in the index. It happens when Taylor talks about Finch’s use of found materials, leading him to imply things have got a bit uncool now, in our day. He diagnoses this as partly due to “the rise of the so-called poetry detectives, who track down plagiarists and ‘out’ them on social media. Quite what the Dadaists and wider avant-garde would make of this practice, one can only imagine.” Later Taylor introduces (with the same thought) me by name: “Ira Lightman ‘the sleuth’ has attempted to become the UK poetry scene’s detective looking for plagiarism. His detection, though in some cases understandable, has caused pain and suffering for those accused. I wonder what the Dadaists would have made of Lightman attempting to create a career out of such work. Perhaps they would have sent him a cauliflower in the post.”
And here we can at least name Taylor’s tone: it is adjoiner-clubbish. He defines himself by fishing for visceral sympathy, preferably around scar tissue, but with keyboard warrior passive aggressiveness. These are the clubs of Pavlovian suggestion. He condescends and banishes me, even though I’ve performed on Radio 3 in collaboration with Peter Finch, read at Writers Forum like Finch, written a poem for Bob Cobbing like Finch, performed and been published by Subvoicive like Finch, and appeared in the same book (Troubles Swapped for Something Fresh) that Taylor calls “important and timely”. Taylor the huffing and rhetorical questioner looks a bit under-informed, even shallow.
Ira Lightman, A Taylored Finch
As it happens, I do trust Wallace Stevens. He’s the high-modernist poet most fascinated by formal logic, as with the illicit conversion — “All X is Y, therefore All Y is X; All music is feeling, therefore All feeling is music” — he puts at the center of “Peter Quince at the Clavier.” Or the strange grammar of the nothing he develops in “The Snow Man.” And, more to point, Stevens comes toward the top of the group of poets, the high modernists, I take as accurate reporters and analysts of the thin modern world: How do we live within it? How do find meaning in a universe without inherent meaning? They are witnesses of the cold disease, the diagnosticians and occasionally the physicians who propose a treatment.
So if we wanted to trust the Stevens poem, we’d notice its mostly tetrameter quatrains and its consistent inversions of ordinary sense: The opening stanza claims that the man-made jar isn’t placed in a surrounding wilderness but makes the wilderness surround it, as though the coherent jar creates the incoherence elsewhere. And from there the poem builds to the difficult double negative of the last lines, the human jar that “did not give . . . / Like nothing else,” contrasted with Tennessee’s wild birds and bush. The grammatical constructions, too, are strange. We get poetic inversions: “round it was,” “of a port in air.” We get jarringly obvious internal rhyme: “sprawled around” a jar “round upon the ground.” We then arrive at flat non-poetic diction: “The jar was gray and bare.” Even the self-diminishing word “anecdote” in the title.
All that, I think, is sufficient evidence that Stevens is in charge enough for the reader to invest in the poem. And what I find when I invest the time — the working center of the poem — is a human object that organizes the surrounding landscape that “sprawled around, no longer wild.” The jar “took dominion everywhere,” and the scholar Roy Harvey Pearce has offered the wonderfully attractive (if not actually helpful) observation that Stevens had in mind a particular brand of canning jar, the Dominion Wide E Special, distributed in the U.S. since 1913.
The sense that I take from this is the diagnostic modern observation that the human is the only remaining source of meaning. We inherit poetic language that points to a prior thickness, but now what gives meaning is “gray and bare,” and perhaps more to the point, sterile: “It did not give of bird or bush,” entirely unlike everything else in the fertile landscape it organizes.
Joseph Bottum, Today’s Poem: Anecdote of the Jar
1 — How did your first book change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?
My first book was actually After (Abingdon Square, 2009), written in the form of letters. For example, “Letter to My Mother,” “Letter to My Father,” etc., as a way of imagining what I would say to them individually had they lived to see me grow up. I worked on it for a very long time, but didn’t know where to send it until a friend who was starting a small press took an interest. This first book of letters was very affirmative and inspiring. I have never stopped writing since.
When On Earth Beneath Sky came out, I was even more proud of my accomplishment. I had sent to the editor a very big stack of prose and poems. Then, he asked me to reduce it to about a hundred pages. After farming daily, I would dive through hundreds and thousands of pages in tears, wondering how I could have written that much over the years as a non-native English speaker. I was spilling out my guts, my memory dumping onto the page as a way of talking to myself, trying to understand my place in the world, in nature, and so on.
After deals a lot with Cambodia, the aftermath, the migration, and what I wanted to tell my parents and siblings—like letters that could be sent to them from the United States. Back then, Cambodia was still closed to the world.
2 — How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?
I came to the US at the age of ten. One of the ways I could learn new English words was to write Haiku—five-seven-five syllables. It taught me how to count. I started writing rhymed poems in high school because I hadn’t read Walt Whitman then. When I won a poetry contest, I received a hundred dollars, which felt so heavy inside my pocket. I was in tears spending part of the one hundred dollars for a hamburger at McDonald’s.
Poetry was short and easy. It was something I could finish, as opposed to starting with fiction or a memoir, like a few Cambodian survivors of the Khmer Rouge Genocide did. I just wrote about my life in the US.
On On Earth Beneath Sky and Echoes Lost to Wind, people expected me to write a childhood narrative under the Khmer Rouge, but I didn’t. I wrote about Cambodia after the UNTAC-monitored democratic elections. The aftermath was full of struggle and hardship. I wrote about love and sex growing up in the US. I wrote about nature, and the farm in Bolton, MA.
I chose the healing narrative rather than, “I am a survivor” of a genocide. […]
7 — What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Do they even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?
I think we don’t have a culture of readers with an intellect like twenty or thirty years ago. The internet has co-opted our brains. Our intelligence is facing a global pandemic of obesity. Brain tumors and dementia are on the rise. The culture of forgetting has infested our bone marrow, clogging our bloodstream with literary porn. So much sensationalism. But I am all for the greater flow as part of the human condition, struggling with how to live, where and what to be or become.
rob mclennan, 12 or 20 (second series) questions with Chath pierSath
— Always reading: God’s Silence by Franz Wright. I don’t think I’ve ever read a book of poems that made me feel so much, that felt so human.
— In an interview on Image, Wright says, “I thought of the poem as the holy thing, the aim of everything. If there’s a change, it’s that I came to see there was no necessity anymore to finish a poem. The poem was a step to the next point. The poems were all attempts to find a place to store the joy and certainty of the ultimate goodness and coherence and tenderness of reality.”
— And maybe I’ve quoted from this before? but he also says,
“I remember very early having the sense that there is one poet in the world, and sometimes if you’re very lucky and you work very hard, you get to be the poet for a while. The rest of the time, you’re trying to earn your way back to being the poet for a moment. Meanwhile, you love poetry itself. It still makes me uncomfortable to call myself a poet. I think of myself as someone in the service of poetry. If I happen to be in that blessed state of consciousness where I am able to write, I guess at that moment I’m a poet.”
— I hope you keep storing joy and tenderness in poems. And by poems I mean any container in which you can put your holy things.
Shawna Lemay, You Cannot Break the Wings of Poetry
There are Iliad people and Odyssey people, but the modern world is Odyssean: great migrations, gap years, road trips; we have lived with Odyssean technology for centuries: trains, planes, and automobiles; we all have careers, which means ‘journey through life’; our highest aspiration is still to undertake the new quest in space. The basic idea of the Odyssey is inescapable. People talk about their side-quests and being the hero of their own life, just as Elizabeth Barrett Browning once joked that she put on her bonnet just as knights used to put on their helms. Odysseus echoes in every advert where the father comes home and his children run to greet him. To be an individual is to be Odyssean, even if our journeys are small, infrequent, and domestic. We all quest, no matter the scale of our lives.
Nolan’s warning is that we risk living in the Iliad, that we are going to become more and more tribal, more distant from “Zeus’s law”, that we are going to put our own civilisation at risk. As this film implicitly acknowledges, nothing Nolan can do will alter that. We will forget the past. Reading the news, it seems apparent that we already have. We are, alas, midway on the waves. Nolan’s conversion of the Odyssey into an action film did not smother the underlying story, but it fits the pattern he warns against all too well. If Troy is going to burn again, watching this film will be little more than a distraction while the ships set sail. If Nolan really wanted to issue a warning, he might have made a film about our own civilisation, a song that will be all they have to remember us, a song of all the promises we failed to keep.
Henry Oliver, My review of Nolan’s Odyssey in GQ Australia
The Nolan film has brought back into the spotlight a tiresome confected controversy over the translations by Emily Wilson, because Nolan has said he was inspired by her version of the Odyssey. (Wilson went on to translate the Iliad too, though with a slightly different technique, and overall her Iliad seems to have attracted less attention.) Like any decent translation, Wilson’s versions have several major strengths and some real weaknesses. I think the best thing about them — especially about the Odyssey, where she kept strictly to a single English line for each line of Greek — is the way she has made the poem into recognisable verse within the English tradition, while also creating and conveying a sense of pace, of narrative energy. The first word Arnold uses to characterise Homer in his essay on translating him, is ‘rapid’. So many — almost all — translations of Homer feel slow or prosaic (or both) compared to the original. Getting it into pacy and plausible verse is a real achievement.
The endless arguments about Wilson’s translation choices and supposedly obtrusive wokeness, carried out almost entirely by people who do not themselves read Homeric Greek, and have certainly never attempted any kind of major translation, has been singularly boring and unedifying. Hers are, certainly, translations of their moment and I’m sure they’ll date fast. I’d be very surprised if anyone is teaching from them in 40 or 50 years time, but this is almost always true. Translations with an escape velocity of their own are very rare.
George Steiner, in a six-page tour de force about the translation of Homer, is very funny about why Lattimore is so leaden: “Striving for a ‘timeless’, unobtrusively lucid idiom, Lattimore has, in fact, fallen into a peculiar cadence, part Longfellow, part Eisenhower.” The Lattimore version, concludes Steiner, writing in the 1970s about a translation published in 1951, “is already a period piece. Its intended timelessness has turned parochial. This, precisely, is what Homer is not.”
If you go on to read a great deal of Homer in Greek, your memory of whatever translation you read first disappears under the weight of it — at least that’s been my experience. I know (because I still have them) that I used Rieu’s translations for both Homeric poems when I was studying them, but I can’t recall anything about Rieu’s style, I have no lasting sense of these poems in his English prose. But obviously most people, if they are profoundly moved by an encounter with Homer, will have met him in a particular translation. I think this might be why people who love Homer but can’t read Greek sometimes get so worked up about (what they view as) inadequate translations: if you have a particular English version in your mind, another could easily seem like a travesty. But really, they all are, in one way or another.
If you want to read about Homer from a standing start, I would recommend Michael Silk’s slim Homer: The Iliad. A Student Guide (CUP, 1987; repr. 2004). Silk’s seven pages on translation (40-7) is less mean and funny than Steiner’s but of a good deal more help for a new reader. He compares Fitzgerald, Pope and the prose version by Lang, Leaf and Myers and shows, concisely but very clearly, what difference the style and diction of a translation makes to our sense of the original. In particular, he puts his finger on the uneven diction that is a weakness of so many modern translations — with some phrases sounding like everyday speech today, some sounding Victorian or Shakespearean, some like a fairy story and so on. This kind of inconsistency of tone is so common in modern translations of ancient texts that it seems almost a default setting, but it has a corrosive effect.
Victoria Moul, What to read about Homer?
When we at Poems Ancient and Modern last saw Hartley Coleridge (1796–1849), he was fast asleep in a cradle at his father’s knee. The first child of Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772–1834) and his wife Sara, Hartley appears in his father’s great early poem, “Frost at Midnight,” as the “babe so beautiful! It thrills my heart / With tender gladness, thus to look at thee.” The father’s heart thrills, specifically, at the thought that in this new life, with its unsullied innocence, the possibility exists for human un-fallenness. Through a sustained connection to the natural world and a carefully nurturing education — so he believes — his child might avoid the corruption that has entered his own soul.
In Hartley Coleridge’s sonnet, “Long Time a Child,” written when the poet was in his mid-30s and published in his 1833 Poems, we might be over-tempted to read the traces of his father’s famous poem. We might be a little too primed to see, in the child-in-the-man of this poem, the ghost of that “babe so beautiful” whose soul, in his father’s vision, was destined for life, not death. We might note with greater irony that that “babe,” now a man, has found instead — having “waked to sleep no more” — the more insistent “sleep,” repeated three times in two lines, of his own inescapable mortality.
Or perhaps it’s not an over-temptation. Inevitably, Hartley Coleridge’s autobiography suggests itself in these fourteen lines: his father’s repeated abandonments that gave the lie to the Romantic vision of pre-lapserian childhood, and his own wounded life of dissipation, which would have left him prematurely old at 37, when Poems appeared. Though he could not have known how far past his own midpoint he actually was by 1833, with only 16 years left to him, still the sense of his own failure to realize any interest on the time granted him drives his poetic speaker’s lament. “For yet I lived like one not born to die; / A thriftless prodigal of smiles and tears . . .”
Even the sonnet’s Petrarchan form echoes the pattern of derailment and stagnation that its words articulate. The enclosed quatrains of the octave, rhymed abbaacca, point to a sense of things imploding on themselves. The introduction of the c-rhyme in the second quatrain intimates a kind of progress, but that forward impulse is wholly enwombed in that initial a-rhyme.
Sally Thomas, Today’s Poem: Long Time a Child
I’ve been saying something of farewell – ok, an au revoir; never say never again – to the sonnet recently. A couple of years ago I switched my allegiance to a sixteen-line form, which has become my new ‘thoughtless default’ for shorter poems. It’s hardly one I can claim to have innovated, and its rules (‘it has sixteen lines and probably four quatrains, but otherwise it can do what the hell it likes’) are far too permissive for it to count as a something worth giving a name; though I’m clear in own mind, at least, that it’s no kind of ‘extended sonnet’, Meredithian, Harrisonian or otherwise.
This might also involve retiring another form I’ve occasionally fallen into that’s isomorphic with the sonnet: the three stanzas of ballad metre I call a ‘twelve-bar’, being precisely the form and measure of a twelve-bar blues. I think of this three-stanza ballad form as a kind of ‘oral sonnet’, since it both encourages and accommodates the same basic ‘this plus that equals this’ pattern as the sonnet proper. In the oral tradition that the ballad form invokes, time and consequence tend do the work of logic, and I’ve found that the twelve-bar formula is more usually ‘that event followed by that event led me to this state’. Blues renders this an emotional as well as an argumentative tension through the musical progression of tonic–subdominant–tonic–dominant–tonic. To use the standard metaphor, this feels to most folk like home-departure-homesickness-home, although this omits those two bars in the middle where you go home for a couple of days so your mum will do your laundry. (Strictly speaking, the emotional contour of the blues form is more ‘this sucks / let’s try this instead / that didn’t work / let’s bring it to a crisis / that didn’t work either and this still sucks but I’m resigned to it.’) The cliché is that you can sing all of Emily Dickinson to the tune of ‘The Yellow Rose of Texas’. True enough – the ballad form is hardwired in Dickinson’s letters, never mind her poetry. But I think it’s more telling that Muddy Waters could have happily covered ‘I Died for Beauty’, or ‘Hope is a Thing with Feathers’ with only minor adjustments to his delivery. For all that Blind Melon Dickinson is maybe the more intriguing prospect.
Giving up on sonnets is maybe just admitting that these days I rarely find myself thinking the kind of thoughts they’re built to express. This is usually some version of a ‘proof’, often in the more dialectic shape of the Elizabethan and Metaphysical models, or the more organic syllogisms of the ‘Muldoon’-style sonnet, where a surprising connection between two things will see an unanticipated third emerge from their coupling. What one is attempting, though, is still just ‘claim and demonstration’; one is still trying to show an emotional truth. It’s the ‘proof’ aspect I’m no longer very compelled by. It contains an unstated premise: ‘Prove to who?’ I’m not sure it was ever the reader, who has other ways of verifying that your poems are true besides their devastating logic. Maybe I’m just a little more secure, if not in my own beliefs, then my ability to be honest about them – and less inclined to attempt the kind of watertight self-justification the sonnet always seems to demand.
Don Paterson, Shakespeare, the Sonnet and the uses of Scholarship
for all that
Tom Clausen, drenched
I will not get to
in this life
the fountain carries on
in the rain
I’m working on a few poems for submissions: a couple of anthologies for groups I’m in. I have joined a few free writing sessions where we sit on a silent Zoom call for an hour to write together. It’s weird but effective. It’s an anchor within the current of the summer and I usually write something. I still go on Sundays to the café to write.
I’ve started having dreams about school. The first one was a sort of nightmare, I woke at 6am in a panic that I had missed orientation and didn’t know what I should be doing in my new/old role. Last night’s was quieter, but still with that sense of anxiety. I was there with other teachers and couldn’t type some information on my phone with my awkward thumbs.
My technology dreams are always a sure sign of stress. I’ve had them my whole life, from not being able to dial old rotary phones to emails going awry on computers to struggling to find info on smart phones. Always with a sense of inadequacy. Something simple I should be able to do but just can’t.
Gerry Stewart, Slow Summer Urgency
I met with a group of poets this week and we talked about poetry publishing, rejection, the money situation (where it costs more to get published than it ever pays to be published, given submission fees etc.) We talked about what kinds of jobs we did to keep from the unfortunate situation the main character of The Adjunct found herself in—homeless, starving, turning to prostitution (see last week’s blog post for review). I talked a little bit about entrepreneurial poets—like those who run weekend courses on their own, or offer editing services, or run online generating courses. Most writers—including fiction and non-fiction writers, not just poets do not earn a living from their advances or royalties. They make money teaching, or fees from readings and conferences, or selling their rights to Hollywood, or running conferences – but not from their books. (Also, a reminder: if you like a writer’s work, please buy their books when you can!) I myself should be better and smarter at making money than I am after all these years. Sometimes the limits are my health (sometimes keeping me from opportunities) and energy and even gumption (how dare I put myself out there? Who do I think I am?)
I also watched the original movie Fame, in which many young people experience rejection in a multitude of arts in the early 80s in a very melodramatic way that probably was edgy for its day (dare I say the tv show was better than the movie?) One character is told if she can’t take rejection, don’t be a dancer, and proceeds to almost throw herself under a subway bus. Dancing might be the one art form with more rejection than poetry—and a shorter lifespan, as injuries, pregnancies, and just life (too short? too tall? too busty? etc.) can put you out of the game by 25 or 30. Fortunately, poetry has no such short lifespan, though poets may find the game a little easier when they’re young (and if they’re hip and attractive, even easier)! But all poets, even the great ones, face a LOT of rejection, and at 53, sometimes I feel that I’ve had enough. But I persist, possibly delusionally optimistic. Succeeding at being any kind of artist involves surviving rejection and not letting it put a permanent “NO!” stamp in your heart or head.
Jeannine Hall Gailey, First Swallowtail Butterflies, Lavender Festivals, Poetry, Money, and Rejection
I believe multiple views can be held within a single Jewish community. (Multiple views can be held within a single Jewish heart. Ask me how I know.) I believe seeking to exclude one another is corrosive to community. I believe we should care about each other across even this disagreement.
And when I think about the teaching that the Temple was destroyed due to sinat hinam, I think of the way I’ve seen Jews tear into each other. I think of the readiness some seem to feel to cast “those other Jews” as beyond the pale / outside the tent / no longer community.
And I imagine that the pain that my heart feels over this community discord is a scant billionth of the pain Shekhinah must be feeling. That’s what sparked this vulnerable prayer-poem, and that’s a big piece of what’s on my mind and heart as Tisha b’Av approaches.
Anyway: I hope you’ll click through and check out Laments.
As usual, the group of collaborators involved in this offering aren’t all coming from the same place. We are clergy and laypeople, writers and artists, denominational Jews and trans-denominational Jews. Among us we hold many different views on Israel / Palestine. And like the Jewish people writ large, together we are more than the sum of our parts.
Rachel Barenblat, Another lament
From the pyre, I tell the judge
Renee Emerson, Mrs. Smith, Burned for Praying in Her Own Language
there is more than one kind of fire.
I tell him I am already burning.
In March 2025, I read the poem “To Sew a Freedom Suit” by Danielle Legros Georges in The New Yorker. Georges had passed away the previous month. At the time, I’d been in the US for 3 years after relocating from Malta (Europe). I’d viewed the US as the land of the free until I came here and realized that “free” is not the word I’d use. After reading the poem, I immediately brought my notebook out and drafted a poem after Georges’.
My version of the poem had the same premise to start with, but rather than the lavishness of Georges’ poem, it spoke of layers of defensiveness against a world that seemed to be attacking and out to get me. I remember the other two connections I’d made (aside from the poem) vividly. One was a mental health podcast episode by Dr. Caroline Leaf; the other was my own fabrication of a visualization exercise I’d used during the meditation I start my writing workshops with. In this visualization, I asked the workshop participants to imagine their bodies building defense layers.
And so, the first draft of my poem came to fruition, and I was quite pleased with it. There was a strangeness to my work; textures that felt simultaneously accurate and unusual. The poem made me uncomfortable in all the right ways. Yet I felt that something was off—it wasn’t close enough to the uncanny experience of being seen as a commodity or a number and trying to build back my individuality, my softness included somewhere in the mix.
I sent it out with a few edits at first, and although it came close a couple of times, it didn’t get picked up anywhere for the longest time. At the time of writing (ironically, after a huge overhaul, as you’ll see), someone has just accepted the first iteration of it. That doesn’t stop me from (hopefully) elevating it for my next collection.
Unstitching and Re-hemming a Poem – guest post by Miriam Calleja (Trish Hopkinson)
Each morning, after/during coffee, I read some poetry – usually from my shelves. If I have an urge for more reading, I go online and search authors. Occasionally, I’ll do the same for flash fiction or short pieces – fiction or nonfiction. At night, I turn to cinema – watching a film before sleep. I allow both morning and evening to be, hopefully, sources for inspiration for my own writing. My writing nearly always begins with fragments that I’ll build on. I jot down the fragments – and then allow the bits to develop into something more. As for the morning or evening patterns, I don’t force any sort of inspiration. I can’t/ won’t do that. I just allow space for it. When I was younger, I started each day with music and ended each day with music. But, allowing the music to lead to inspiration – giving space for it, not forcing it – was the same.
Charlotte Hamrick, Bedtime Rituals
O Lord, that last, late-evening cappuccino—
Maryann Corbett, Sleep trouble
beautiful fuel of poets’ conversations,
inspirer of wild readings and sweeping gestures,
intense, froth-headed, somewhat over-the-top—
that was poor judgment. Here I am again,
bug-eyed at midnight. Brain a wheeling hamster.
Groping the darkness for some ropey ladder
down to oblivion. Hauling You along.
In America football is presented as entertainment, goals are greeted with jingles, games begin with enthusiastic announcements and count downs over the stadium’s sound system. The World Cup has become a puffed up pageant, a gaudy, money making spectacle and yet I follow it with the same duty and commitment, with the same contained excitement and expectation I have for poetry. It has become a part of me, I live with it and through it, am frustrated as much as I am exhilarated by it.
Roughly 25% percent of all games will end in a draw with almost ten percent of those being goalless. When I was a reader for a national poetry competition most of the work I encountered in the preliminary rounds was turgid and dull. I came across hundreds of one – nil loses, an abundance of nil – nil draws. Overwhelmingly though what I confronted in the poems was suffering. What made the experience miserable was not being witness to the pain but to people’s inability to express it. If I was a football pundit I’d call out a lack of commitment, say it was sloppy, careless, casual, that hurting is not enough. I want my football and my poetry to be open and free flowing, if there is loss then let it be moving and beautiful, in defeat let it be thrilling and exhilarating. Remember Gazza’s tears in Turin? How they lubricated the nation’s heartbreak. That was poetry.
Let’s be honest. Most poetry, like most football, is utter rubbish. Most poetry is just like watching England play. It is painful not because it is an eloquent representation of human suffering, it is painful because it’s just a bit shit. There was a time when certain match day commentators even had sympathy for supporters who let their passions run away with them, who caused trouble on the terraces, showed more fight than the team they’d paid money to see. “While we certainly can’t condone this kind of behaviour, after watching a display like that one can understand the fans’ frustrations.” I feel the same way about bad poetry.
Jan Noble, Nº73 How Barbara Hepworth helped me recover from the World Cup
The easy resolution. The account I gave of a marriage ending was clean, and had a moral, and let me feel the chapter closed. It broadened, in its last line, into something that sounded like wisdom. It was a proverb. A proverb is what you reach for when you cannot yet bear the particular, and it lets the poem — or the year — feel finished without having been lived through. I had ended on the wrong line. The repair, in a poem, is nearly always the same: cut the consolation, and sit with the plainer thing underneath it.
The speaker contemplating instead of acting. This is a failure mode I can name in four seconds in a stranger’s draft — the poem whose speaker stands at the window and observes, beautifully, and never once crosses the room. I did not see, for a long time, that I had built a life in that grammar. I watched. I described. I was excellent company at the window. The poem does not come alive until the speaker moves, and neither, it turns out, does the man.
The buried subject. The hardest, here as on the page. For years I wrote around a thing rather than towards it — around the shape of a life I had not yet let myself want, the making of a home, the people who stayed when they had every reason not to, a new house with no memory of its own that I walked into carrying all the memory it was ever going to have. I was fluent. Fluency is how the buried subject hides. The poem that will not arrive is usually the one still circling the thing it most needs to say. […]
Behind the whole taxonomy sits a single conviction I drew from Heidegger’s Aletheia and named, years ago, in the title of an as yet unpublished collection, What Storms Disclose. Bad poetry conceals; good poetry discloses. That is the sentence The Cutting Room exists to enforce. What I had not let myself notice is that it is not a sentence about poems. It is a sentence about attention.
A life lived without attention conceals — from others, and more expensively from the person living it.
A life lived with attention discloses. The knife I take to a failing draft and the attention I have had, slowly and late, to bring to a failing stretch of my own years are not cousins. They are the same instrument. I only ever owned one.
Adam Cairns, What the life was reaching for
I bow to the blooming squash flower,
to whorls of seaweed on the shore.
The moon’s fingernail wakes me—I am its wayward child,
Luisa A. Igloria, Araria
a tiny insect
blinded by light,
climbing rungs
streaked with
ash.