A personal selection of posts from the Poetry Blogging Network and beyond. Although I tend to quote my favorite bits, please do click through and read the whole posts. You can also browse the blog digest archive at Via Negativa or, if you’d like it in your inbox, subscribe on Substack (where the posts might be truncated by some email providers).
This week: notebooks full of angel drawings, a dream of burning, forced dactyls, a springboard to spring, and much more. Enjoy.
Do poets tend to have managers, or at least drivers? I think we should be issued with one for gigs and the like. It may stem from me not being the best driver in the world, but I drove back from a reading in Faversham last night and it absolutely horsed it down in stair rods all the way back. There was an hour and a bit I wouldn’t care to repeat in a hurry…
I am always grateful for the gigs, but that’s the second gig now in a couple of weeks that involves travelling an hour or more in each direction.
Two weeks ago it was a trip to Chipping Norton to read at a lovely gallery there called Art & Talking. […] It’s a 150-mile round trip to Chippy and back for me… However, I got to read for the first time in a beautiful venue, I got to read with the wonderful Laura Theis and Robin Vaughn-Williams again. Robin puts on a great night….The open mic readers were also excellent. My friend’s teenage daughter told me I wasn’t as boring as she thought I would be, so I’m calling that all worthwhile.
Mat Riches, The Great Song of Indifference (and Engines)
At my desk I drink my coffee, check my diary again and work out how many hours I need for the other non writerly stuff in the week. This week I have emails to answer, a small pitch to put together and a meeting about a future work project that I am trying to pull together. I also have a couple of requests for brain picking sessions from emerging writers who want advice because they are writing in similar fields. I do these when I can, but I can’t always do them because it sacrifices time from my own work. I always feel guilty turning down endorsements and blurbs for exactly the same reason, and invitations to read at events from tiny organisations who don’t have a budget. I do them when I can, but I can’t always do them.
Then to work. I have to put my phone in a drawer otherwise every time I get frustrated I will look at it for the quick dopamine hit of watching cats do stuff. I am addicted. I cannot stop at one cat video.
On my notice board I have this quote by Hilary Mantel – my notice board is a shrine to this god of writing whose wise words have gotten me through some awful blocks:
“If you get stuck, get away from your desk. Take a walk, take a bath, go to sleep, make a pie, draw, listen to music, meditate, exercise; whatever you do, don’t just stick there scowling at the problem. But don’t make telephone calls or go to a party; if you do, other people’s words will pour in where your lost words should be. Open a gap for them, create a space. Be patient.”
In my case other people include cat videos.
Wendy Pratt, Day by Day: My Writing Week
Looking at my notebooks full of angel drawings and asemic mark making, I’m sure the average person would see a sort of madness. I prefer to concentrate on the meditative quality. But maybe the marks are a kind of refusal. (To be anything less than completely human). The more marks I make the more I realize that it is impossible to make the same mark twice. In fact, I’m generally trying for a unique mark/scribble. Some days the marks are responding to a piece of music I’m listening to but other times, I’m notating the silence, or the sounds in my skull. They are a ravelling and an unravelling, a joy, a calm, a human touch. Sometimes deliberate, sometimes wild, or thoughtless, beyond thought, a flying, a soaring, a darkness, a skating, a tangle.
Shawna Lemay, With No Illusions But With Some Joy – On Asemic Writing
It’s so hard to focus these days, and find a rhythm of living that is not disrupted by fear. I mean we all should be feeling fear, but also hope and joy and solidarity. I hope you are all staying as safe as you can be.
One thing that helped me recently was to do an event at Clio’s with the DSA and the Oakland Education Association Rapid Response Team, a group of Oakland educators organizing to protect families from ICE. They organize community patrols and raise funds to provide legal aid, click here if you want to donate. Just being in the room with with people who are taking action and being in solidarity felt good. Zeina Hashem Beck, Jason Bayani, and Sara Borjas gave amazing readings. I read some poems too.
Another thing that helps is to read a poem closely, and just sit with it. I’m getting ready to teach an on-line class on Tuesday on how to read a contemporary poem, which in some ways is an absolutely absurdly vast subject to even begin to approach. But I have some thoughts of ways to do it. Reading closely for me is always the way I get back to writing. For me, reading poetry is really about accepting and embracing and getting excited about what is challenging, unexpected, new, different. Reading poems has changed me. I feel like if everyone read poems there would be less evil in the world. I realize that’s naive, but I can’t help thinking it.
Matthew Zapruder, Reader, You Already Know
There is an intervention by poets to be made, into the fiction-led “should writers read” debate and the “should writers read for pleasure” sequel. It should have something particular, and not only concerning that poets don’t get paid very much. It should also consider Donald Davie’s dictum that there is a group pressure to remain at the level of the skilled amateur – because for them, and you can detect this in many blurbs that aren’t (soi-disant) political, everything is “reading for pleasure” if they read other poets at all. For the practitioner of the ancient art, there is definitely reading for fulfilment, for a guide to living, and living must include pleasure. I wonder too about suggesting a new category for the current debaters of “reading for morality”, which is what enables us to sift among people who make political speeches and also to act locally (which will affect the personal anecdotes in our own poems but also guide us in making narrative without it always having to be politically exemplary – whatever that is – line by line). Regardless of all of this, what of seeing the poet made to struggle by their poem – not with the poetry basics, but with a form they could handle easily if it were inert? An oeuvre entirely composed of good poems that are totally commonplace workmanlike in the idiom of a century or two up to the day is unlikely to survive. So is the struggle crucial, and how do poets do their reading of other poems to aid the struggle only of not writing badly (not, per se, every time the political struggle nor, as with fiction, “good writing”/the saleable)?
Ira Lightman, READING TO WRITE POEMS
On a news channel someone says the President
Bob Mee, HARPOONING PRAWNS IN A WOK
is planning a gigantic triumphal arch
and wants an airport named after him.
(Of course he does.)
Wind rattles the windows.
I think ‘OK, I need to get work done’,
open the laptop, remember once
a Buddhist monk told me
in a station waiting room
life requires no explanation.
Look at this picture from the gold medal winner for women’s figure skating, and her celebratory leap in the air. And if you haven’t done it yet, watch Alysa Liu’s gold-medal winning skate—I promise even if you don’t like skating, it will inspire joy. If they don’t cut it, you can see how afterwards she curses as she celebrates, as well as hugging the bronze medalist and swinging her around in a spontaneous hug. It reminded me of the poetry world, how we need to celebrate our wins with this much joy, and the wins of our friends and colleagues.
On that note, AWP. I’m not going to be there this year, as I am instead taking a trip home to Cincinnati to visit my father, who is ill, and family. Which is not to say, I will not miss seeing my friends. But AWP can be a lot even for completely healthy young people, much less people with disabilities and illnesses that tend to flare up under stress. And right now, I have to prioritize family, and if I only have so much strength, energy, and money for travel, I’m going to choose home over a conference. If you’re going, I hope you have a wonderful time, and post lots of pictures. […]
I […] had good news from my poet friend, Kelli Russell Agodon—she got her first poem in the March issue of Poetry, “Trying to Sext My Partner, Who Replies ‘I Can’t Get My Camera to Work.’” It’s not up on their web site yet, but I got my issue and so Charlotte the literary kitten and I had so much fun reading it.
Jeannine Hall Gailey, Missing AWP? Me too. Celebrating Wins, New Glasses, and Quail
I stopped going to AWP when I had a baby and haven’t attended since. For many years, I blamed new motherhood for my lack of attendance. But I am no longer a new mother. And yet, I still have not attended the conference.
It is only now, in writing this, that I think I understand the true reason. In 2014, my last time at the conference, I was genuinely dismayed by how little attention was paid to the serious crises within academia. So much so that I was compelled to write an open letter to AWP: Professors in homeless shelters: It is time to talk seriously about adjuncts.
Since then, the conference has improved somewhat in this regard. They have incorporated one or two panels on the subject of adjuncts. There is also now an AWP Writers Adjunct Caucus. Yet largely, the conference remains dedicated to pursuing one’s own personal career ambitions—publishing, getting an agent, improving craft, enriching one’s pedagogy.
Meanwhile, 70% of the academic workforce is now contingent labor. Many adjuncts are earning less than minimum wage. Since I published that article in 2014, conditions have only gotten worse. Adjuncts still report juggling several teaching jobs at once, working for poverty wages, and avoiding hospital visits for fear of financial ruin.
According to the Higher Education Inquirer,
Pay and Financial Security: Poverty Wages Become the Norm
In 2006, Hoeller reported that Washington community college adjuncts earned just 57 cents for every dollar paid to their full-time colleagues. The disparity persists—and in some ways, it has widened. Today, more than a quarter of adjuncts report earning under $26,500 a year, below the federal poverty line for a family of four.
According to a report on The Impacts of 2020 on Advancement of Non-Tenure Track and Adjunct Faculty,
The pandemic…increased career insecurity for non-tenure-track faculty in ways that are more subtle but equally important. For instance, when institutions extended tenure and promotion clocks, they often failed to think about the implications of moving online for instructional and research faculty.
All this and yet I’ve yet to see a single panel dedicated to the kind of structural changes that would improve the material conditions of grad students, adjuncts and non-tenured professors. These might include sessions on how to create a grad student union, how to obtain health insurance as adjuncts, how to organize a sit-in at your university for increased teaching stipends (as former Gulf Coast editors and students at University of Houston successfully did).
But no. Such panels do not exist at AWP. Meanwhile, there are all sorts of panels dedicated to political engagement. We can learn to “write resistively” or learn “Cartooning at the End of the World.” We can discuss “Editing for Community and Change” or “Strategies for Navigating Organizational Change.”
But, it seems, what we cannot, must not, should not ever discuss is the broken system staring us all right in the face. Perhaps it’s not very sexy to have a panel dedicated to collectively organizing for health insurance and a living wage. Or, maybe such panels might not be very welcome by those who actually sponsor the conference.
Becky Tuch, Q: Why does AWP barely touch the crises in academia?
Lately, I’m trying to find enough mojo to send out some poems. My thinking is that given current circumstances, having poems in (mostly) online journals offers more possibility that someone, anyone, will read them. Poetry like most arts is communicative, so poets need readers; I treasure my readers, but they are few. I love books, but my books do not sell well. That means the poems don’t reach an audience. This blog doesn’t have a host of regular readers, either, though there are some stalwart followers for whom I am immensely grateful. Then what are a poet’s options? Small-press publication (let’s hear it for those wonderful folks!) and self-publishing can get you the physical book, but for readers you have to do a ton of self-promotion. This is a skill I have never developed and that I do not, at my age, wish to learn. Besides, I am out of the job market now and have no need for a CV full of publication credits.
But I read literary journals. My colleagues in creative writing read literary journals. Some lit journals continue to produce paper issues, bless them, but more of them post poems on various social media platforms, where casual viewers might run across a poem and–who knows?–read it! Therefore, it seems to me that’s what I ought to be doing: getting my work in magazines, large and small, local and international, professional and amateur, one poem at a time as a kind and careful editor decides my poem suits the journal. I think that in 2026, more poems reach people online than in books. Am I wrong about that? I guess I could research that question if I really want to know.
Of course I love books and will never stop reading them, poetry books and other kinds. Of course I would be thrilled to have another book in print if the manuscripts I send out ever were to find homes. However, probably my focus this year will be on the more ephemeral but wider-reaching media forms. I want to remind myself that I write because what I want to say may be valuable to someone other than myself; might strike someone as beautiful, sad, or wise; might make someone think in a different way or learn something new. Poetry has always done that for me, after all.
Now if only I can generate the mojo…
Ann E. Michael, Midwinter mojo
I’ve lost my enthusiasm for all things writing, except the actual writing. I’ve barely tried to get published, picking publications and press that I have a connection with or that I really want to get into, mostly through sheer bloody-mindedness of getting rejections year after year. I’m determined that eventually I’ll find one they like.
My poetry collection that was accepted in 2019, and delayed and delayed, will never be published, at least by that press as it is closing this year. The editor had long gone silent to my queries, so I stopped trying. I continue to occasionally send out that collection and my others to different editors, more out of habit than with any hope.
Mostly now, I think of my collections as a record of my life and thoughts that will never really be shared until I’m gone, like my writing notebooks and my diaries, just a bit more thematically organised. And the thought of not publishing them doesn’t really bother me. […]
I wrote or finished 73 poems in 2025 which is higher than average for me, as most were written for a specific collection that will probably never be published. I’ve had an urge to write unusual love poems, so I’ve just gone with it. I think it’s complete, but as is my way, I will continue to tinker with it for a long while yet.
My new writing practice routines means I’m writing regularly, even if only just a few notes or scribbles. I try and draft out at least one poem a week, not necessarily a good one, but it’s a nice feeling on Sunday to have something typed into my drafts file. […] I’ve gone back to the process, what I love about writing, the slow accumulation of ideas, words on the page.
Gerry Stewart, Sweeping Away the Last Clutter of 2025
Under my bangs
Kristen McHenry, Lenten Poem-a-Week Project: Week 1
this smudged and gritty
cross a remembrance:
A dream of burning, my very
bones done in.
Unbidden, I imagine
a wombfashioned from
blue, purple, and crimson cloths(knitting and weaving:
women’s work)twisted yarn like blood vessels
intertwining, carrying blood
back and forth, looping in
the lungs of all creation, nourishing
us in this nest
where if we listen, really listen
we can hear the heartbeat
of Shekhinah.*
Another poem from my current project, an expanded volume of Torah poetry. This poem arises out of Terumah in the book of Exodus.
Rachel Barenblat, Mishkan
Lately, I’ve been experimenting with my writing – (as in Dr. Frankenstein but using a journal and pencil in place of electrodes and lightning) – and it’s opened doors and closed windows for me. I’ve discovered a great deal in the power of words, but I’ve also found new rivers in myself. And that’s felt good.
I’ve spent the last two years moving into hybrid work – fusing genres, blurring lines – or that’s what I’m telling myself. But, it seems to be working on several levels. There’ve been a few falls from cliffs, of course, but I keep moving.
I’m more open to ideas, less controlled. A statement by Stanley Kunitz – “A poem has secrets that the poet knows nothing of” – has been a map for me. I apply his notion of “secrets” to all the forms of writing I’ve been working in – poetry, essay, cnf, flash.
I also hear words by Flannery O’Connor in this – “I write to discover what I know”. My own writing does reveal layers of self – layers I didn’t know were there, but they were. They’ve always been there. Waiting.
So – we wait – for the writing to appear. And, we never know when that’s going to happen. Of course, I’m meaning the moments of writing that lead to discovery – not the day-to-day writing, in whatever genre … the time set aside or found to allow the drafting to move forward. Writing with no plan, no agenda. Putting words on the page – or screen.
Sam Rasnake, The Experiment: Finding the New
Like all endings, endings in poetry are often caught between two extremes. It is tempting to slam the door too hard, or to slink out so quietly nobody notices you’ve gone. They are all the more difficult, I think, when a poet is writing in so-called free verse, though ending a (so-called) formal poem isn’t exactly easy either.
Perhaps, like all the best endings, the best endings in poetry aren’t endings at all. Looking back at the poems I wrote about on this blog last year, one thing I notice is the way in which they each close with musical and metrical effects which ring out after the poem is over: Thomas’s misty counties, Brooks’s twinklings and twinges, Masefield’s long trick, even Larkin’s whispering trees. Here is the final stanza of ‘Why Brownlee Left’ by the Irish poet Paul Muldoon, its abandoned horses staring out beyond the last line:
By noon Brownlee was famous; They had found all abandoned, with The last rig unbroken, his pair of black Horses, like man and wife, Shifting their weight from foot to Foot, and gazing into the future.
The horses can’t quite move forward into the future they’re gazing at, but they keep moving all the same. They seem to be caught there forever, shifting their weight from foot to foot. And one way in which Muldoon achieves this effect is by setting that ambiguous image, the not-quite-ending, off against the ‘closing’ rhyme which, again, is only half a closure (foot to / future). A half-rhyme is all it takes to set the thing ringing. Muldoon makes it look easy. It isn’t.
Jeremy Wikeley, Poetry of Departures
In the 1970s, I didn’t know poems could speak to my life as a young woman. I’d never heard a contemporary poet read in person. That changed in college when I discovered Diane Wakoski’s Motorcycle Betrayal Poems. Later, hearing Gary Snyder read about wildness and Gwendolyn Brooks describe love “like honey” made me realize poetry could be a living, breathing force. I wanted my students to feel that too—and to find the power of their own voices.
I also wanted to bring in some of the magic of InsideOut, the Detroit poets-in-the-schools program founded by Terry Blackhawk. I invited local poets from the University of Michigan or visiting writers passing through town. We hosted all-school readings, performances, and a beloved event called “Shorts on the Ledge,” where students read brief pieces from a hallway ledge during National Poetry Month. We partnered with Jazz Band, Dance Body, and the annual Art Show. We read poems on the first day of school and at graduation. Whenever the school gathered, we offered a poetry prelude.
In 2011, a colleague and I opened our classroom once a week for Poetry Club. We advertised in the student bulletin, hung posters, and I brought homemade cookies or muffins. Our formula was simple: read a poem, talk about it, write, and share. Students came because they needed a place to write what they wanted to write in school.
Fifteen years later, the club is thriving. In the early days, we begged for five or six students; now a dozen come regularly.
Creating a High School Poetry Club: Why and How – guest post by Ellen Stone (Trish Hopkinson)
When I was at school, the English department ran a (voluntary) verse speaking competition, in which we, well, spoke verse, competitively. It was immensely absorbing. One year, I did ‘Death, be not proud’ (alas, when I tried it just now, I only remember the first quatrain). Another year, I did a passage of Paradise Lost, (ending ‘Who durst defy the omnipotent to arms’) now lost to me. I knew other sections of Milton at university. I performed in several Shakespeare plays, and remember a fraction of them now, though I know my way around Hamlet reasonably well. In those days, though it was never a formal requirement, I took memorisation seriously. I once knew the whole of Ode to a Nightingale…
It didn’t all vanish, thankfully. And the poetry I learned subsequently has largely stayed with me, and I slowly add to my stocks, meagre though they are. (One thing I can recite in full on demand is Hilaire Belloc’s Matilda, of all things.) I decided several years ago to start memorising more, (including several poems by Robert Frost, which I used to say by heart to my children when they were little), and though I am, and always have been, an insufficient pupil, bad at schedules and consistency, I am not entirely failing at that endeavour even now, though I do far too little.
Last year, I memorised ‘Daffodils’ by Herrick. I am currently learning ‘My true love hath my heart.’ Alan Lascelles, Private Secretary to King George VI (and also to the Abdicator—hiss) knew Gray’s Elegy by heart, as, once, did so many English school boys. Lascelles was appalled to learn that the king hadn’t even heard of it. Perhaps I shall learn that one next. I am resolved to take memorisation as seriously again as I used to at school. (Join me!—though you should expect me to fail!)
Henry Oliver, George Steiner breaking my heart with his description of the way people used to memorise poems, Bible passages, classic works.
The students look at me as if I’m the lab
animal in the crate, and they’re the scientistscircling the room with clipboards and pens.
I dearly want to know: what will it taketo kindle a fire, get them to care
about stories and poems, warm upto metaphor and meaning? Toward the end
of the session, they shut their tabletsand zip backpacks close, heave out of their
seats and walk out of the room— expressionsmostly unchanged as I erase the board, return
Luisa A. Igloria, Strike Anywhere Match
the matchstick to its box marked “strike anywhere.”
This scene was outside King’s College Cambridge yesterday [photo]. Typewriter at the ready, the poet offers the public a “Poem on the Spot”. No AI.
Today I went to Huntingdon, about 30km from Cambridge. They have an alley of murals I didn’t know about, featuring T.S. Eliot, William Cowper, Lucy Maria Boston, Henry of Huntingdon, George Herbert and Samuel Pepys.
Tim Love, Street Poetry
I am currently on hiatus from daily poems in favor of hammering away slowly [at] plays as I try to increase my skills there, but will be making an e-zine in March of the Bluebeard poems (and a special print book object edition for Patreon subscribers, so keep an eye out for that.) You can still get in on the action there before the end of this month and land a signed copy of CLOVEN and my little 2026 desk calendar featuring collage work. This was a small print run, but I hope next year to make both a spiral-bound calendar and a desk standing version.
Tuesday, we are headed to Steppenwolf to see another Strindberg play, Dance of Death, which looks to be about a contentious marriage, which fits well as I am finishing up a first draft of the Chopin adaptation. This week, we also have new bookshelves arriving to deal with the living room situation, in which they are basically collapsing under the weight of way too many books[.]
Kristy Bowen, notes & things | 2/22/2026
How easy it is to build a house from the pieces at hand. A mini table here, a houseplant and storage boxes there. With glue, scissors, pencil, cardboard, wood. But who says it couldn’t look completely different? Each little house remains one model among many.
marks
on the new floorboards
years agoHow many variations could be created? Imagine them in a single line. The judges enter. Point with their fingers. Take notes. Look concerned. Smile. Move back and forth.
How easy it is to read the room but forget the house.
Kati Mohr, Compass Needlework
I’m fascinated by the potentially infinite array of how literary influence shapes writing. How could American short story writer Lydia Davis, one of the most striking prose stylists of the past few decades (as well as one of my personal favourite writers), profess that the late Connecticut prose poet Russell Edson (1935-2014) was the most important writer on the development of her style? Whatever overlap between their work might exist, one of these things is not like the other.
One of the first of my contemporaries I encountered with a personal library as large as mine was the late Toronto writer Priscila Uppal (1974-2018), and there was something both striking and wonderfully exciting upon realizing our libraries had little to no overlap. From what I could see, only P.K. Page’s Hologram (1994) was the exception, although I’m sure there were others. Based on her library alone, one might gather that Uppal’s was a literature fueled by a narrative lyric with a more European base, offering a heft of titles by Guernica Editions and Exile Editions, which sat as a counterpoint to my own, rooted in 1960s Canadian postmodernism: west coast TISH poetics, Talonbooks and Coach House Press, into the prairies and south, towards Black Mountain, Richard Brautigan and the San Francisco Renaissance. I remember thinking how glorious it was to see a collection so wildly different but equal in scale, and the two in counterpoint suggested to me the mark of a healthy, vibrant literature: knowing these alternate perspectives were both held in high regard. If you want a quick overview of how any writer is shaped, head straight for their library.
Of course, influence is rarely a straight line. A collage, perhaps, or a constellation. I remember a conversation with Kingston writer Steven Heighton (1961-2022) and Ottawa poet David O’Meara, back when O’Meara had that apartment in Ottawa’s Lowertown; how they both swore by John Berryman’s “Dream Songs,” as collected through his 77 Dream Songs (1964) and His Toy, His Dream, His Rest (1968). I remain baffled by their attachment to the work. I’ve also never understood how anyone could enjoy the poetry of Don Coles, another poet I know admired by Heighton and O’Meara. What am I missing? The years I’ve attempted to return to the work of Robert Duncan, unable to grasp the appeal, despite admiring the work of multiple writers who swear by him; despite my holding Duncan’s contemporary and compatriot Jack Spicer as such an important poet across my own trajectory, as well as Robin Blaser, the third in their triumvirate of American poetry and poetics. The San Francisco Renaissance: Spicer, Duncan and Blaser. What am I missing?
In some ways, I find Davis citing Edson reminiscent of longtime and former Talonbooks publisher Karl Siegler who once offered that he could see how the works of Vancouver poet George Bowering or Montreal poet Artie Gold influenced my work, but couldn’t understand my attachment to the work of the late prairie poet Andrew Suknaski. I mean, I thought it might have been obvious, but I suppose not: I came to Suknaski through the work of Dennis Cooley (and other prairie writers, I’m sure), latching onto Suknaski’s self-described “loping, coyote lines,” and quickly realized an affinity to how he returned to writing on the histories and complications of his geography-of-origin, a geographic and cultural space that had not yet been articulated through poetry. This is where I might point to the crowd, and bellow: I say “Glengarry,” you say “Wood Mountain.” A chant begins.
rob mclennan, Lecture for an Empty Room
For former Indiana Poet Laureate Norbert Krapf, it took nearly 50 years of listening to the deepest, locked-away part of himself to address the profound abuse to which his Catholic parish priest subjected him when Krapf was a child. During the period of that abuse, the priest took the photograph that became part of the cover art for Krapf’s 2014 autobiographical collection Catholic Boy Blues (Greystone Publishing), and gave it to Krapf’s parents. That haunting photograph, an evocative visualization of the painful words comprising Krapf’s poems, contains both dark secret and starker truth. Krapf wrestles with both over the course of his four-part collection by assuming four dramatically different yet intertwined voices: the boy who suffers sexual abuse, the man who sets upon the “healing journey” that requires reconciling the boy he was to the adult he became, the priest whom Krapf allows to engage in dialogue with the boy, who finds in himself the extraordinary courage to speak back once and for all, and a wise figure Krapf calls “Mr. Blues.” The latter speaks in four voices, too — friend, advice-giver, counselor, mentor — that if they could be sounded as one, might best be described as “savior,” for Mr. Blues ultimately helps the boy Krapf was and the man Krapf is today to “break free” of “the language of pain” to sing as “one with the spirit inside me” where hope and forgiveness, even love, reside. Mr. Blues teaches boy and man to see that
there’s always a hopeful boy inside the man. Deep down lives a hopeful boy inside the man won’t quit fighting till he comes out best he can.
In that final “Love Song for Mr. Blues” from which the above lines are quoted, we find all the reasons Krapf is able to survive his harrowing journey.
*
Catholic Boy Blues, the twenty-sixth of Krapf’s more than 30 books, is dedicated to “my sisters and brothers of any age in all lands abused by priests or other authority figures.” As anyone knows who pays even slight attention to the news, especially over the last two decades, an enormous group of Catholics and former Catholics — Krapf now known to be among the thousands of primarily male adolescents abused — suffered a profound silencing, because of the presence of priest-pedophiles in the Church. Krapf movingly describes that silencing:
Not even the great
~ “Not Even Isaiah and Jeremiah”
visionary wordsmiths
Isaiah and Jeremiah
had to find words
to tell their people
how it feels
for a boy
to be so defiled
by a priest
that for fifty years
he keeps his mouth shut
even to those he loves.In his acknowledgment in the Preface that his “responsibility and mission as a poet” oblige him to share the “dirty little secret” with the public, Krapf, born in 1943, bears startling witness to art’s power to save when, as the persona Mr. Blues says in “Mr. Blues Wakes Up,” we can “sing it straight.”
Maureen Doallas, Norbert Krapfs ‘Cathlic Boy Blues’
Part of the reason why Isobar is a vital press is because [Paul] Rossiter has a clear purpose in mind for it, a purpose with three parts or strands. The first of these is to bring into English the work of key 20th century Japanese poets who have been generally neglected, poets like Yoshioka, Kiwao Nomura, Rin Ishigaki and Sanki Saitō (to name just ones that I’ve reviewed). Many of these poets engaged with western poetry; Yoshioka translated Rene Char, who was a key figure for Nomura, and Ishigaki was also clearly influenced by surrealism. Equally, the VOU poets were clearly in conversation with western concrete/visual work.
The second strand is the publication of English-language poets who live and work in Japan, and who engage, to one degree or another with Japanese literature and culture. The result is that Isobar books are a venue for cross-cultural fertilisation in very real terms.
Glasgow–Tokyo Line by James McGonigal and John Pazdziora, subtitles An East-West Hyakuin, fits perfectly into this strand. A hyakuin, for anyone who doesn’t know, is a 100-poem renga, or linked verse, written collaboratively by two or more poets turn-taking. There are rules or conventions to the form that McGonigal and Pazdziora follow, with one key exception; their collaboration was not in person and limited to a single block of time, but extended and conducted through email.
Another interesting aspect of the book is the blend of languages, with most of the text being in standard English, with a healthy leavening of Scots, and the odd hint of Japanese included. This has the effect of making it seem like there are more than two voices at play at points.
The linked verses hover around the passage of time, the seasons, mortality, impermanence and, ultimately, cyclical renewal.
Can fresh leaves foretell
the snick-snap of garden shears
on October days?There’s a sense of the human integrated with the Buddha nature of the world:
Billy Mills, Several Isobars: A ReviewStretching for plums, my fingers
greet a snail. Good day, neighbour.
I love this love poem, the “philia” kind, dear old pal. Nostalgia in its “algia,” an ache, but funny and odd, in the way that old friendships and memories can be. There is a helplessness to it, how the speaker is awash in his own foibles, ones that he knows he can admit to this old friend, who likely knew them all too well, and maybe had a few more. It cracks me up. It makes me sad-laugh, laugh-cry, this apostrophe, which is a strange word for speech or a poem addressed to a person, as its etymology lies in words meaning “turning away from,” but is also used to describe an indicator of possession, as well as an indicator of something missing. Which also makes me sad in a isn’t-that-funny way.
Marilyn McCabe, the fate of the cruel & unusual
How should I be? is the question I’ve been asking myself these last two months. If my lifespan is now counting down in years or months or maybe even weeks rather than the decades I expect we mostly luxuriate in imagining, what is it I should do with a day, an hour, a breath, a synapse? What should be my mindset, and the means by which my time—imaginary god—is made? Thus far I have tried: pious, melancholic, pragmatic, defeated, paralyzed, depressed, and, simply, numb: unfeeling, unthinking, if-I-don’t-move-nothing-else-can-go-wrong. Those of you who know me in real life can probably guess that none of these has fit particularly well.
One must have a mind of winter I thought to myself yesterday, getting dressed for a run, and as I ambled along in safe-heartrate-zone I found myself transfixed by the verbs: to regard, to behold. Stevens was an insurance executive, and legend has it that he’d send a page down the street to the library to copy out definitions and etymologies of words he was turning over in his mind whilst writing policies and other boring business things, a fact I take to mean: there is nothing accidental about any word that turns up in one of his poems. It’s not simply that one must accept one’s circumstances in order to understand them so much as that one must accept them—develop a mind for their reality—in order to see them clearly and thus to hold them in esteem, to see what is remarkable, what can be held dear, no matter the odds.
Vanessa Stauffer, “The Snow Man” by Wallace Stevens
In addition to showing us that grief is both a complex shared and unique emotion, Webb suggests that there are many forms of loss, just as complex and difficult to resolve. in She called her Melanie we meet the unresolvable loss of a mother who gave her child up for adoption; in New and to him who came from my body we find the loss of a way of life experienced by a mother on the birth of her first child and the loss when that child gains independence; and in If only you didn’t have to shove your living in my face we find the loss and ultimate recovery of self-respect during and after an abusive relationship.
There will be many potential readers who have experienced grief in their lifetimes: it is an inevitable consequence of having loved. There will be much to connect with for such readers in this collection. However, like all literature worth reading, Webb offers us fresh perspectives and insights, deepening our understanding in emotionally intelligent poems of great skill.
Nigel Kent, Review of ‘Grey Time’ by Julia Webb
Among the poems one really doesn’t expect, there’s this: a poem about Christ’s forty days in the wilderness by Robert Graves (1895–1985). Graves was young when he published the poem in his second collection, the 1918 Fairies and Fusiliers. He’d been through the war, become friends with the poets Siegfried Sassoon (1886–1967) and Wilfred Owen (1893–1918), and published his own war verses. (In 1985, a memorial was placed in Westminster Abbey for the poets of the First World War. The long-lived Graves was the only one left to attend.)
He had yet to write his memoir of the war, Good-Bye to All That (1929) or his strange book about poetry’s beginning in worship of a divine mother figure, The White Goddess (1948). His best-selling historical novels, I, Claudius and Claudius the God, wouldn’t appear till 1934 and 1935.
In 1918, for that matter, Graves had yet to make a public point of his loss of faith. By 1948, following James Frazer’s The Golden Bough (1890–1915), Graves would insist in The White Goddess that “Christian legend, dogma and ritual are the refinement of a great body of primitive and even barbarous beliefs, and that almost the only original element in Christianity is the personality of Jesus.” In Today’s Poem, “In the Wilderness,” however, Graves emphasized not the personality but exactly those mythopoeic elements of Jesus. (He would later call it his “last Christian-minded poem.”)
His fantastical account of that mythopoesis is aided enormously — turned nearly into an incantation prayer — by the rhymed two-stress lines of the poem and its forced dactyls. The meter quickly turns artificial, standing outside the natural words to become the kind of musical chant we know from nursery rhymes and counting games.
Joseph Bottum, Today’s Poem: In the Wilderness
[Geoffrey] Heptonstall explores the nature of storytelling and how a narrator can try to influence a reader to draw a desired conclusion. However, a narrator can’t control a reader, especially a reader with an enquiring mind, who reads and sits with what they’ve read to bring their own lived experience to the text and question it. Ultimately, Heptonstall also questions what truth might be. A narrator doesn’t tell the same story twice, placing emphasis on certain details can tailor the story to a different audience, who, for cultural or personal reasons, might need different arguments or persuasion to see the narrator’s viewpoint. “The Truth on the Tongue” is a quiet, thought-provoking collection that aims to recreate the sense of timelessness that is an audience listening or reading a tale.
Emma Lee, “The Truth on the Tongue” Geoffrey Heptonstall (Cyberwit) – book review
Last week I was struck by the wording of a Latin memorial composed in the 1660s by Payne Fisher — once Cromwell’s poet, though glossing over that phase for obvious reasons by 1665 — for one Jane Robinson, wife of Thomas Robinson, protonotary of the Common Pleas and prominent member of the Inner Temple. Jane died in November 1665, aged 49, of metastatic breast cancer. Most unusually, the memorial specifies the disease and even how it was treated:
Septendecim Annos
Cum Marito suo suavissimè feriata est,
Et ab Ipsius sinu demùm malevolè divulsa est
Per MORBUM CANCRALEM.
Cujus infandos Cruciatus postquàm diù victrix pertulisset,
Et Laevè Mammae detruncationem
Intrepidè passa fit:
Veteri (post intervallum sex Mensium) revertente Morbo,
Et vitalia validiùs invadente,
Fato concessit:This means:
For seventeen years
she rejoiced most sweetly in the company of her husband,
and was at last cruelly torn from his embrace
by CANCEROUS DISEASE
after she had long victoriously endured its unspeakable torments,
and had intrepidly suffered the amputation
of her left breast:
when the old disease returned (after an interval of six months)
and invaded her vital organs more powerfully,
she yielded to fate.This describes a mastectomy — surely a very horrible business indeed in the 1660s, without any anaesthesia — that Jane surprisingly survived, followed by a recurrence of the disease, which spread into her vitalia, i.e. her interior organs. This seems to describe metastasized cancer, recognised as such. Although general statements about the courageous endurance of suffering are quite common in elegies and memorials, this sort of detail is unusual and must have been requested specifically, presumably by her husband.
Fisher’s inscription is prose, not poetry, though it is densely rhetorical in a way that we might associate more with verse. The pronounced alliteration for emphasis — as at Veteri (post intervallum sex Mensium) revertente Morbo, / Et vitalia validiùs invadente, is typical of Fisher’s style. In any case, the distinction between Latin prose and verse in this kind of text was fuzzier than you might think: the mid- to late seventeenth century saw a particular vogue for a kind of free verse in Latin that was related to the fashion for the ‘literary inscription’. (I’ve written about Latin free verse and related forms before here.) Fisher, who had a sharp ear for a new trend, was rather a pioneer in this form. Back in 1651 he composed an elegy for Henry Ireton the Latin of which is a very early British example of this kind of free verse. The parallel English version uses rhymes, and indeed it is parallel-text examples like this help to demonstrate that this sort of Latin was understood as verse, rather than prose.
Victoria Moul, Dying is a difficult enterprise
“The moment of writing is not an escape, however; it is only an insistence, through the imagination, upon human ecstasy, and a reminder that such ecstasy remains as much a birthright in this world as misery remains a condition of it.”
At one point in March 2024, I copied these words into a yellow notebook. It was the spring of Larry Levis; azaleas aching to bud, stammering possible colors in the margins of former journals. I remember thinking spring would destroy me, as it does annually, gutting me with its flushes and fevers, distracting me from the needs of surrounding mammals. Each day lengthening by inches of light. Moths moving like nocturnes near the doors. And Levis’ poems garlanding the floor of the porch with their gentleness…
WOUND
I’ve loved you
as a man loves an old wound
picked up in a razor fighton a street nobody remembers.
Look at him:
even in the dark he touches it gently.Like the ravish of spring, Levis seasons his stanzas with unremitting tenderness for life, the sap-work of being. I return often to his “My Story in a Late Style of Fire,” for the momentum it accrues as it winds down the page, working the space between the biography and the apologia:
I also had laughter, the affliction of angels & children.
Which can set a whole house on fire if you’d let it. And even then
You might still laugh to see all of your belongings set you free
In one long choiring of flames that sang only to you—
Either because no one else could hear them, or because
No one else wanted to. And, mostly, because they know.… and for the inflammatory, unforgettable scherzo:
One of the flames, rising up in the scherzo of fire, turned
All the windows blank with light, & if that flame could speak,… and for how Levis circles the figure of Billie Holiday, a talismanic figure that animated his jazz pantheon, jazz being the musical form that Levis deployed and studied for its repetitions and returns and metaphysical resonances.
“My Story in a Late Style of Fire” is a self-portrait that leaps from the canvas like the face in Caravaggio’s convex shield, occupying the continuous present of poetic address. Yet its speaker takes leave of the reader with an embrace, a likening as bright as it is critical:
I know this isn’t much. But I wanted to explain this life to you, even if
I had to become, over the years, someone else to do it.
You have to think of me what you think of me. I had
To live my life, even its late, florid style. Before
You judge this, think of her. Then think of fire,
Its laughter, the music of splintering beams & glass,
The flames reaching through the second story of a house
Almost as if to—mistakenly—rescue someone who
Left you years ago. It is so American, fire. So like us.
Its desolation. And its eventual, brief triumph.Brief, it is. Brief as the blooming set to a season. And what literary form turns this brevity to face vastness? Poetry.
Alina Stefanescu, Larry Levis: For love of immanence.
In the interests of research I’ve been doing some investigating. Just how easy would it be to pass off an AI-generated poem as one’s own work?
So on Chat GPT I offered the prompt: “Can you write a 14 line poem with a science fiction theme in the style of Caroline Bird?” In a few seconds this is what it produced:
The British Secret Service issues me a sensible coat
and a name that tastes like static.
I learn to listen through walls politely,
to sip tea while history clears its throat.
My handler says don’t fall in love—
everything leaks eventually.
The dead drop is a park bench feeding pigeons secrets.
I memorise faces the way others memorise prayers.
At night, the truth sleeps beside me, fully clothed.
London keeps blinking like it knows.
I file my feelings under miscellaneous,
and burn the rest with the kettle on.Once I’d tried the same exercise with four or five other poets a few commonalities started to leap out, such as heavy use of simile, often one ‘quirky’ idea per line, little or no through-references, sonic echoes or layered meanings. The poems kind of looked like poems but there wasn’t much below the surface, Which ties in with the fact that AI is only privy to what’s already been written. Or as Rachel Piercey, editor of Tyger Tyger said to me: “Each new poem works on its own terms – a highly individual, poem-by-poem house style that AI could never comprehend, because it has never been done before and AI can only look back.”
The twist in the tail is that I then ran these AI-generated poems by Originality.ai, an AI engine trained to spot AI in texts. It’s not fool-proof as is has been trained primarily on non-fiction texts, but the result was pretty conclusive. […] Busted!
Robin Houghton, Can AI engines write poetry?
This my the 52nd free newsletter / essay / manifesto / article and it marks one year of writing weekly dispatches on this platform. It is also the tenth and final chapter in a series I’ve been writing about the poet John Keats and his last days in Rome.
February is an important month in the Keats calendar. It was in February of 1820 that the poet suffered his first lung haemorrhage, coughing blood and understanding the seriousness of his condition. He would die the following February in Rome, cared for by his friend, the artist Joseph Severn.
Over these last weeks I’ve described events leading up to his death and it doesn’t make for easy reading. We know how this story plays out and who really would want to follow it toward its inevitable, uncomfortable, painful end? This wasn’t exactly the reason the poet who wrote to me gave when she left but I think it had something to do with it. She’d spent long periods of last year in hospital, in pain and witness to the pain of others. Weekly instalments describing another poet’s demise isn’t exactly the most comforting material to receive. I myself find a fatigue has set in as the story of Keats approaches its sad conclusion. I mean, what do you say? I mean, what can you say? […]
I thought I’d shift focus, not in order to avoid describing how a light went out, not to ignore the Bright Star of this story but to consider its supporting actor, Joseph Severn.
Severn had been with Keats on his journey from London in September of 1820 when the Maria Crowther set sail on an arduous voyage to Naples. He was there for the poet’s 25th birthday in October spent in quarantine on their ship in the Italian port. There are stories that he threw Keats’ opium overboard into the Bay of Naples believing, with their arrival, the promise of fairer weather would restore the poet’s health.
Severn felt Keats no longer required the drug he’d used to treat the pain of his condition and the sore throats he suffered brought on by coughing fits. Severn later removed (another) bottle of laudanum from Keats’ possession in Rome when he feared the poet may try to take his own life. Severn was a man of faith. A believer in God. Keats was not. While Keats didn’t possess the same fierce atheism that earned Shelley the epitaph of ‘the infidel poet’ he was a free thinker, his devotion was to poetry. That he may have been tempted in his last days by the ‘ungodly’ act of suicide was something abhorrent to Severn. Although it goes too far to say he’d rather see his friend suffer in acute pain than provide him with oportunity to end it forever we do know how tormented Severn was in his duty of care, how he wrestled with decisions such as this.
Nicholas Roe, chair of the Keats Foundation and fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, states in his 2012 biography that he believed that Keats was in fact an opium addict and Severn, among several of his friends, was aware of this. It is a claim, of course, and there’s no real evidence beyond the jealous mood swings Keats displays in letters to his fiancee Fanny Brawne and veiled references to the use of opiates (in Ode to a Nightingale for example) to support it. He certainly didn’t have the same appetites as Samuel Taylor Coleridge who was a bonafide junkie and the first poet to enter rehab. But that’s another story.
Jan Noble, Nº52 Loving the pain away
Whitman’s words in the preface to the original edition are at least as radiant and rousing as the verses themselves — words that continue to enliven heart, mind, and spirit a century and a half later. He writes:
The land and sea, the animals, fishes, and birds, the sky of heaven and the orbs, the forests, mountains, and rivers, are not small themes … but folks expect of the poet to indicate more than the beauty and dignity which always attach to dumb real objects … they expect him to indicate the path between reality and their souls.
And yet he does indicate the path. In a passage partway between sermon and commencement address, he writes:
Maria Popova, Walt Whitman’s Advice on Living a Vibrant and Rewarding LifeThis is what you shall do: Love the earth and sun and the animals, despise riches, give alms to every one that asks, stand up for the stupid and crazy, devote your income and labor to others, hate tyrants, argue not concerning God, have patience and indulgence toward the people, take off your hat to nothing known or unknown or to any man or number of men, go freely with powerful uneducated persons and with the young and with the mothers of families, read these leaves in the open air every season of every year of your life, re-examine all you have been told at school or church or in any book, dismiss whatever insults your own soul, and your very flesh shall be a great poem and have the richest fluency not only in its words but in the silent lines of its lips and face and between the lashes of your eyes and in every motion and joint of your body.
I have been looking at rough drafts, as I’ve been doing when I don’t have a new poem bubbling up. I am surprised by how many poems came from the bushel of apples I bought in October. In the future, when I deliberate the wisdom of buying apples in bulk, let me remember how many ways those apples fed me.
Kristin Berkey-Abbott, Tuesday Scraps: Texting Mix-ups and Passings and Other Goblins
After last weekend’s yarn show I set myself a catching up kind of a week. The kind where sparkly conversations with good friends featured amongst time to tackle admin type things and time to see if the poems that wait patiently in the draft folder are ready for polishing. The kind of week without a particular routine which allowed for resting and for seizing the moment when there was a gap in the rain to take a daily stroll.
It was good to get out for daily walks again after having recently had to wait for my cough to diminish. I felt my body easing its way back in to striding out and being glad for being out in the fresh air. I also realised how much I had missed listening to music for that dedicated segment of the day. My soul shines more fully when the right sounds are in the day. The country road route is currently muddy and wet, but I like its familiarity as I get back into the swing of things. The fact that walking this route takes as long as listening to the album Personal History by Mary Chapin Carpenter is also rather splendid.
It was good to have a free and easy week, it felt rather like having a springboard to jump from on the journey towards spring. Spring is my favourite season, and I love the feeling of entering it with a sense of renewal and to revelling in the newness it offers. So many reminders of growth as the rhubarb stretches out new stems and the snowdrops flourish in the borders. Mixing these wonderful visuals in with the joy of lengthened days makes so much seem possible. It even had me venturing into the garden with a pair of secateurs to begin the big tidy up.
Sue Finch, I SEE BLUE SKY
It’s an all-white affair, the blizzard sweeps
in with style, its blinding white tux,
bow tie and stiff starched shirt,
its grandeur, its threats and proclamations,
its show of power. In a flick of its
handsome wrist, it shows us who’s who.How blankly we stare at its parts,
Jill Pearlman, Mr. Universe
its top hat and white entrails,
wanting, not wanting its magic entourage
to disappear.
春泥に厚き硝子の破片かな 松本てふこ
shundei ni atsuki garasu no hahen kana
spring mud
a thick piece of glass
in it…
Chōko Matsumotofrom Haiku Shiki (Haiku Four Seasons), August 2025 Issue, Tokyo Shiki Shuppan, Tokyo
Fay Aoyagi, Today’s Haiku (February 17, 2026)